Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO)

An SI Board Since August 1995

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
77400	741	0	CSCO

Emcee: Lynn	Type: Moderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
76450	The comparison is in growing infrastructure that then has to be supported during	Jorj X Mckie	-	12/7/2010
76449	Wow, you bought it near it's lows and around the time I loaded up, when Aker	John Koligman	-	12/7/2010
76448	"Which is pretty much exactly what IBM has been doing for years now, buying	Kirk ©	-	12/7/2010
76447	There is a HUGE difference between Cisco and CA. Chambers can and does fire any	Kirk ©	-	12/7/2010
76446	True, but they still have a bloated pig of a float, 5.6B per your post? IBM is	John Koligman	1	12/7/2010
76445	Where are you getting this dilution idea from? Outstanding shares have been dro	Elmer Phud	-	12/7/2010
76444	JMO, but I think they let the dilution go on way too long and probably should ha	John Koligman	1	12/7/2010
76443	<i>Perhaps Chambers should give Palmisano a call to 'see how it's	Elmer Phud	-	12/7/2010
76442	"If Cisco was interested in providing shareholder value, then they would ha	John Koligman	3	12/7/2010
76441	mm, I am very familiar with CSCO's performance over the past 10 years. Thou	Jorj X Mckie	-	12/7/2010
76440	google.com	Elroy	-	12/7/2010
76439	Hey lml, the truth is that whether it is organic growth or acquisition based gro	RetiredNow	-	12/7/2010
76438	<i>Short term gains in the stock are not necessarily what is best for the	RetiredNow	-	12/7/2010
76437	Only one man's opinion: reuters.com	Edward Boghosian	-	12/6/2010
76436	>> Sorry, UF, but LOL. Anybody can grow a company by acquiring others that	Uncle Frank	1	12/6/2010
76435	<i>One might say that identifying, and integrating acquisitions that will	lml	-	12/6/2010
76434	>> My rant was referring to ORGANIC growth. I presume you know the differ	Uncle Frank	1	12/6/2010
76433	>> I bought Cisco a long time ago at 44-45. The rest I'm sure everyone	Uncle Frank	-	12/6/2010
76432	UF, can u break down how much of that $40B is the result of acquiring company a	lml	-	12/6/2010
76431	>> Chambers has really done nothing with this company, IMHO Cisco's	Uncle Frank	2	12/6/2010
76430	Cisco: Oppenheimer Says Buy, The Worst Baked In blogs.barrons.com	JakeStraw	-	12/6/2010
76429	<i>What has he done with this company the past decade to take advantage of	Jorj X Mckie	-	12/5/2010
76428	Enough with the facts and the numbers! You're ruining the whole story!	Elroy	-	12/5/2010
76427	CSCO's outstanding shares have been declining for at least 10 years moneyce	Elmer Phud	-	12/5/2010
76426	Agree, mindmeld. Message 26974006 When organic growth is great, paying stock o	lml	-	12/5/2010

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):