SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Knight/Trimark Group, Inc.
An SI Board Since July 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10027 74 0 KCG
Emcee:  jacksoo Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
7652 Thanks for the response. We'll see what the next few days brings us.Mookie Pierce-3/28/2000
7651 Mookie: I think there is nothing unusual yet in the price action of the last fTimbaBear-3/28/2000
7650 TimbaBear, What's your take on the last 2 days? The NASDAQ looks like it Mookie Pierce-3/28/2000
7649 Morgan, Your thoughts on how we have done the painful work in the 30s and 40s George the Greek-3/28/2000
7648 All right, I was supposed to take a break from posting, but given the panicked Sir Francis Drake-3/28/2000
7647 Piper Jefferies reiterates buy on NITE $75. target.vestor-3/28/2000
7646 Very interesting NITE perspective from Gary Craft, Alex Brown e-finance analystgbh-3/27/2000
7645 Volume on NASDAQ has lightened considerably lately. While not a big negative gKeith J-3/27/2000
7644 Entirely predictable pull-back. There was no way that NITE could have broken thSir Francis Drake-3/27/2000
7643 Ray... Thanks for the clarification. I have sold calls against some of my posTimbaBear-3/27/2000
7642 TB: I was writing calls against a long stock position that I had on SWS and Riskmgmt-3/26/2000
7641 No harm done, Cube. I just find volume/price analyis of the greatest value compSir Francis Drake-3/26/2000
7640 Just teasing you Morgan. CubeCube-3/25/2000
7639 Cube, I was referring specifically to charting. There is a distinction, and f.eSir Francis Drake-3/25/2000
7638 For whatever it is worth, my charting shows the next level of significant resisCube-3/25/2000
7637 Well, add good music to the wine, and subtract the Amy factor and there you havSir Francis Drake-3/25/2000
7636 Morgan, <i>Most of the charting posts I've read on NITE are worthlesCube-3/25/2000
7635 Morgan. In the "spirit of whimsy" - drinking a glass of Chardonay in dejavu-3/25/2000
7634 Yes, I am not taking into account a whole bunch of things - this is done all inSir Francis Drake-3/25/2000
7633 You are not taking into account the possibility that Shorts protect themselves manny t-3/25/2000
7632 The short interest in NITE on March 15 was 12,440,357. This means that since thSir Francis Drake-3/25/2000
7631 The Economist article on increased volatility in the stock market: economist.cSir Francis Drake-3/25/2000
7630 Michael....Thanks for the reply. I have sold covered calls, just didn't thTimbaBear-3/25/2000
7629 Retracements etc. I got several PMs asking why it is "good" to have Sir Francis Drake-3/25/2000
7628 You are correct, but you are selling something you don't own - the calls. michael katz-3/25/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):