SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO)
An SI Board Since August 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
77400 741 0 CSCO
Emcee:  Lynn Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
76575It makes a lot of good sense that a vital product (networking equipment) should Elroy-2/11/2011
76574I think CSCO may be facing stiffer competition - pricing & otherwise - from JakeStraw12/11/2011
76573<eyes rolling> Paul Krugman is the most rabid neo-Keynesian economist out RetiredNow-2/11/2011
76572Hi Dinesh, If a company's purchases of inventory were higher than their saleRetiredNow-2/11/2011
76571>> More on Bolshevik Bernanke's Central Economic Planning Committee &lSr K-2/11/2011
76570How does inventory buildup increases COGS? What kind of costing model might theyDinesh-2/10/2011
76569There you go, Elroy! More support for my thesis that inflation is cropping up evRetiredNow-2/10/2011
76568Well, more than inflation pressure is at play in Cisco's numbers. That is foRetiredNow-2/10/2011
76567Good question. Let's examine gross margins to see if there is any evidence oRetiredNow-2/10/2011
76566LOL. Ur correct! Meant to say "only an idiot." But really, have tlml-2/10/2011
76565Cisco employees eatin' too much food! ==================== Kraft says moreElroy-2/10/2011
76564I don't doubt that there are Cisco specific issues, which is what I'm suRetiredNow-2/10/2011
76563to >>sell or short the stock, which no idiot would do at this juncture, tSr K-2/10/2011
76562>> stoggy old IBM << IBM has hit a series a new highs and recently Sr K-2/10/2011
76561I referred to "the COGS <u>percentage</u>>" If Cisco Sr K-2/10/2011
76560Don't know if this is typical for Chambers on a yearly basis, but it sure loJohn Koligman-2/10/2011
76559'I'm just connecting the dots here. You'll know if I'm wrong witJohn Vosilla-2/10/2011
76558It seems that my view of Chambers' dismal performance as CEO, which I first lml-2/10/2011
76557The consensus seems to believe that competition in switching, the mix to consumeJakeStraw-2/10/2011
76556More on Bolshevik Bernanke's Central Economic Planning Committee: zerohedgeRetiredNow-2/10/2011
76555Wrong. Check your accounting books from college, if you went to business school.RetiredNow-2/10/2011
76554>> At what point do investors call Chambers on his less-than-mediocre perfUncle Frank-2/10/2011
76553price cutting increases the COGS percentageSr K-2/10/2011
76552Wrong. YOu would be right if all they saw was lower revenues, because discountinRetiredNow-2/10/2011
76551Quite possibly, but anyone who has been following the impacts of Bernanke's RetiredNow-2/10/2011
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News