SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO)
An SI Board Since August 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
77400 741 0 CSCO
Emcee:  Lynn Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
76850Maybe if Cisco followed the lead of Acer at protecting shareholders instead of iKirk ©26/4/2011
76849U.S. used 'unmitigated gall' and B.C. court to jail exec <b>Judgeaverage joe-6/3/2011
76848Re Art Laffer, you'd think that these people would tire of being a horse'JBTFD15/28/2011
76847Everything was fine and dandy according to Art Laffer in 2006. Why am I not surJohn Vosilla-5/28/2011
76846>>'I don't think our politicians understand the depth of the problJakeStraw-5/25/2011
76845'I don't think our politicians understand the depth of the problems we&#John Vosilla-5/25/2011
76844RUMOR: Cisco Is Putting Linksys And WebEx On The Block (CSCO) Read more: busineE_K_S-5/23/2011
76843It's possible, but remote. I don't think our politicians understand the RetiredNow-5/23/2011
76842'I won't risk my portfolio, which represents my blood and sweat for the John Vosilla-5/23/2011
76841from UPSIDE | MAY 21, 2011 Are the Tech Titans Now Value Stocks? online.wsj.cSr K-5/21/2011
76840very good post. Chambers will look like a genius for saving all this cash and aJorj X Mckie-5/19/2011
76839Agree. Any market sell off is sure to take some of CSCO's hide. But some mlml-5/19/2011
76838Gotcha. Well, things are about to get worse. This summer is going to be a doozy RetiredNow-5/19/2011
76837JOhn, if we had a free market in stocks, then this might be a good time to get iRetiredNow15/19/2011
76836<i>He may fail, as you suggest, . . </i> Don't think I suggestelml-5/19/2011
76835>>I keep thinking back to Gerstner when he came onboard with IBM and the cJakeStraw-5/19/2011
76834Do you think Chambers and co continues behaving like the 80 year old landlord, mJohn Vosilla-5/19/2011
76833I keep thinking back to Gerstner when he came onboard with IBM and the company tJohn Koligman-5/19/2011
76832>>I just don't believe you get to his level of prominence without a heJakeStraw15/19/2011
76831You could be right, lml. I don't really know. The fact is that I made good mRetiredNow-5/19/2011
76830I based my view upon: (i) my view that he's failed shareholders the past declml-5/18/2011
76829Don't count on it. I think many people are vastly underestimating Chambers aRetiredNow-5/18/2011
76828He will -- in time. Most likely will be gone this time next year, hopefully soolml-5/18/2011
76827>>chambers needs to resign That seems to be what the market is implying aJakeStraw15/18/2011
76826chambers needs to resign.Brasco One-5/18/2011
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):