SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Parlux (PARL) Fragrances
An SI Board Since June 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
527 3 0 PARL
Emcee:  Feraldo Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
77 Seems like the slide under 6 has really demoralized everyone here. I'm not Peter Shaw-9/4/1996
76 Hi Kevin! Just averaged down today myself. Now, at $9.25 I'm making monDon MacNeil-8/20/1996
75 Hi Don, I owned PARL since about six weeks ago. After earnings came out, anKevin F. Spalding-8/20/1996
74 Since reading the "Motley Fool Investment Guide" some months ago I cDon MacNeil-8/19/1996
73 Hey Don, I do use WSJ on the net and find it to be a great resource. I still dsaw-bones-8/19/1996
72 M.! You've got to find and join Wall Street Journal Interactive on the Don MacNeil-8/17/1996
71 1.2 Mill shares traded on Thurs. - that's extradordinary. I'm not suresaw-bones-8/17/1996
70 Hi Jeremy! I guess I've become the Parlux den mother on this thread! PlDon MacNeil-8/16/1996
69 Hello- I too am a follower of this company and think it looks like an extraordiJeremy Smith-8/15/1996
68 Hello, "M."! From Britain? That's exciting...welcome aboard! Don MacNeil-8/13/1996
67 13 cents per share last qtr. vs. 12 cents the year before. Anyone know what exsaw-bones-8/12/1996
66 Hey guys, glad to find this thread. I rec. you Al from the SMSI thread. Isaw-bones-8/9/1996
65 I don't have definitive answers, William, but from what I've seen, letDon MacNeil-8/7/1996
64 I'm glad you two have opened up this thread. I too am a parlux believer. william e. harte-8/7/1996
63 The kids don't dig perfume, I guess. Not sexy enough. But the margins arDon MacNeil-8/5/1996
62 Gee Don we have the same impression about the majority of the people posting ,tal cari-8/5/1996
61 al...maybe one of PARL's problems is it's just you and me! SeriouslyDon MacNeil-8/2/1996
60 Don,Does it make any sense to you why PARL dilutes the shareholders interest byal cari-8/2/1996
59 I AM concerned at how this whole business of Perfumania's going private wiDon MacNeil-7/26/1996
58 Don Thanks for the clarifaction.I hadn't mailed the proxy in as yet ,so I al cari-7/26/1996
57 No, Al, I actually voted for it, and here's why: the prospectus clarifiedDon MacNeil-7/25/1996
56 Don,I hope everyone on this thread voted against this dilution, not that it wilal cari-7/25/1996
55 Info update: apart from PARLs falling like everyone else over the past two weeDon MacNeil-7/23/1996
54 Let's keep this thread alive, guys. Especially now during what I'm coDon MacNeil-7/20/1996
53 The pop in Parlux was a sympathy move with a company called Perfumania, which wPeter Shaw-7/8/1996
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News