SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
FirstWave Technologies (FSTW)
An SI Board Since June 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
9677 33 0 FSTW
Emcee:  Roger A. Babb Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
7702Ted, you don't think I'm afraid of the MSFT threat do you. Naw, open thBuddy M-1/22/2003
7701MS CRM goes to press By Stacy Cowley January 21, 2003 1:04 pm PT NEW YORK --TEDennis-1/22/2003
7700... but two isn't quite as bad. TED [century post AND a dbl-dbl] PS: Hey, TEDennis-1/22/2003
7699Time out .... It would be in bad taste to post three in a row just to get a gruTEDennis-1/22/2003
7698Holy bad vibes, Batman !! I see what you mean by the Yahoo newbies. They say tTEDennis-1/22/2003
7697Mind the gap? ;-) Well, I guess it depends on whether the two rumor-monger newbOeconomicus-1/22/2003
7696Wow. Broke 14 to the downside. Sure glad I decided to wait for a while before TEDennis-1/22/2003
7695Ted, had me worried for a minute. Buddy MBuddy M-1/22/2003
7694OUCH !! They have TWO versions right out of the chute. One for the tire-kickerTEDennis-1/22/2003
7693Buddy: re: did you really mis-understand my meaning? Of course not. Was just fTEDennis-1/22/2003
7692TED, lots more info in the company PR. biz.yahoo.com Like these tidbits (emphasOeconomicus-1/22/2003
7691MSFT released CRM yesterday afternoon Microsoft launches CRM software after delTEDennis-1/22/2003
7690Thanks. And don't ask "for what". Just thanks. Buddy MBuddy M-1/22/2003
7689You mean the part about your wife's handling of something? No, I'll haveOeconomicus-1/22/2003
7688Ted, did you really mis-understand my meaning? Bob, did you see the same thing Buddy M-1/22/2003
7687<<<i>Would that term be "clean", or "gentlemen" Mike M-1/21/2003
7686"using term loosely" ... Would that term be "clean", or &quTEDennis-1/21/2003
7685<<<i>How your wife handles ... what?</i>>> Let's keMike M-1/21/2003
7684Buddy: re: You ought to see how my wife handles it - wow. How your wife handlesTEDennis-1/21/2003
7683Come on Bob, how can you expect me to remember what I meant. My view point is nBuddy M-1/21/2003
7682Then it wasn't just me who didn't understand what your point was? That&#Oeconomicus-1/21/2003
7681Beats me. Buddy MBuddy M-1/21/2003
7680<i>I take it as being open to answering questions. The depth of some of quOeconomicus-1/21/2003
7679Buddy: That could be true. There will probably be some questions asked that theTEDennis-1/21/2003
7678Ted, ref: Could be. Makes me wonder, though, why they wouldn't include in tBuddy M-1/21/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):