Sepracor-Looks very promising | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical
Sepracor-Looks very promising

An SI Board Since August 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
10280	115	0	SEPR

Emcee: rkrw	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
7705	<i>Why are they trading at a premium? </i> Because they are like lo	Biomaven	-	9/11/2004
7704	"Clearly they think it is a very good idea to pay a nominal 13 % on the fac	Rocky9	-	9/10/2004
7703	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities. (From 8-K filed today). [Clearly they	Icebrg	-	9/10/2004
7702	My reactions (FWIW - probably nothing): 1) "Sepracor development of drugs	Rocky9	-	9/10/2004
7701	The report doesn't get any better - if anything it is worse. Raises concern	Robohogs	-	9/10/2004
7700	I've just started skimming a very negative report on SEPR from the Stanford	A.J. Mullen	-	9/9/2004
7699	>>Well, Aristeia Capital, LLC, was not one of the CV holders, but other th	Icebrg	-	9/8/2004
7698	>>Sepracor's Debt Conversion To Narrow Losses 09.08.04, 1:03 PM ET	tuck	-	9/8/2004
7697	13-G filed--5.68% [snip] <<11 PERCENT OF CLASS REPRESENTED BY AMOUN	quidditch	-	9/8/2004
7696	Some larger block sales today 100,000 shares or more, including two after hours	jayhawk969	-	9/7/2004
7695	>>That piece seems to be somewhat dated.<< Indeed, October 2003. C	tuck	-	9/7/2004
7694	That piece seems to be somewhat dated. The FDA comment period for the phase-ou	Biomaven	-	9/7/2004
7693	Tuck, Good find, anyone want to guess the timeframe?	jayhawk969	-	9/7/2004
7692	Glad to have sparked some discussion regarding reimbursement and formulary issue	tuck	-	9/7/2004
7691	The conversion feature was way in the money, so the bonds would be trading well	Biomaven	-	9/7/2004
7690	"John: <<The cv bondholders, already beneficiaries of shorting the st	John Metcalf	-	9/6/2004
7689	pov on conversion of cv bonds as house-cleaning in anticipation of a sale: I do	quidditch	-	9/6/2004
7688	<i>As an investor I give Estorra 80+% chance of approval.</i> Well	Biomaven	-	9/5/2004
7687	Tuck: My feeling, and it's only a feeling, is that the reimbursement issue i	fred hayes	-	9/5/2004
7686	<i>I'm a bit surprised that holders of NBIX and SEPR don't appear	jayhawk969	-	9/5/2004
7685	reimbursement (in the sense that you were using it, "girlfriend's SoCal	scaram(o)uche	-	9/5/2004
7684	I'm a bit surprised that holders of NBIX and SEPR don't appear more conc	tuck	-	9/5/2004
7683	Reviewing the 0% bonds: A - $250MM of bonds due '08, convertible at 31.89.	Rocky9	-	9/4/2004
7682	Yeah, some scary thoughts. Thanks, ICE, JD, rkrw. On the smiley side of the co	John Metcalf	-	9/3/2004
7681	And then uses calls to retire shares maybe? The bonds should have only been tra	Robohogs	-	9/3/2004

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):