SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Value Investing
An SI Board Since November 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
79279 1223 4
Emcee:  Paul Senior Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
77231Over the years the strategy has worked for NVR and it appears PHM is trying to mpetal12/24/2025
77230Haha, fair point. The question wasn't altogether serious, although I think ipetal-2/24/2025
77229I agree there are too many variables to consider to make a safe assessment. If tFIFO_kid222/24/2025
77228I thought Eastman Kodak would be a winner when I first bought a few shares in 19E_K_S-2/24/2025
77227I would rarely say a question is stupid, but considering I am not sure the uniteMadharry-2/24/2025
77226Both, or neither.S. maltophilia-2/24/2025
77225Fair enough, but again, the investment question was what's going to be a gooElroy-2/24/2025
77224 main concern is not current valuation True that, but most of this thread has aS. maltophilia22/24/2025
77223Given that the question was about holding a stock for 100 years, I think a main Elroy22/24/2025
77222provided you actually own them for that period At my age and childless, that woS. maltophilia12/24/2025
77221I think most staples do well over 100 yrs with the least risk - provided you actHarshu Vyas22/24/2025
77220xom used to split 2-1 every 7 years. That was up until it bought Mobil.berniel-2/24/2025
77219I00 year holding? Almost everything could be obsoleted, or mismanaged to death.Paul Senior-2/24/2025
77218I agree. You have two main decisions; (1) your Buy point and (2) your Sell pointE_K_S12/23/2025
77217one company for 100 years Take a look at PG. Their rates for debt (10-K; note 1S. maltophilia12/23/2025
77216Whichever company I chose as a good idea for 100 years I would want to buy only Lance Bredvold42/23/2025
77215I 100% agree with this!Harshu Vyas-2/23/2025
77214Coca ColaElroy-2/23/2025
77213>If you had to own one company for 100 years, which company would it be? Thecandsrr-2/23/2025
77212If you had to own one company for 100 years, which company would it be?petal-2/23/2025
77211What I missed was the NAV being specified in the CC..Pittman does it, CEO Luca aBob Rudd-2/21/2025
77210BABA finally got a 1/2 tout from cramer on cnbc after spewing the china not beinMadharry-2/21/2025
77209JXN,I think i owned it briefly took a quick profit and sold it I have no idea wMadharry-2/20/2025
77208JXN. I also did not understand the company and its low p/e. Still don't. Paul Senior-2/20/2025
77207JXN. I did not buy when originally mentioned here because I did not understand Grommit-2/20/2025
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News