SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Sepracor-Looks very promising
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10280 115 0 SEPR
Emcee:  rkrw Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
7730Ambien CR NDA has been filed too. Which is an interesting admission by sanofi. Nrkrw-9/17/2004
7729Pretty much agree Jonathan (although your last comment on the green shoe has me quidditch-9/17/2004
7728Jon, You feel about the same way about this as I do. I have in the past been supIcebrg-9/17/2004
7727The new convert is pretty expensive if you add the cost of forcing conversion onRobohogs-9/17/2004
7726<i> mkt will be crowded, there will be little growth</i> Two drugs Biomaven-9/17/2004
7725VTSS converts priced tonight. 1.5% interest - 35% premium for conversion - due &Rocky9-9/16/2004
7724If the MDI makes it within year of filing then I think Sepracor can be profitablHarold Engstrom-9/16/2004
7723That has been becoming my fear too - SEPR becomes ICOS. Articles already showinRobohogs-9/16/2004
7722I doubt '05 profitability. I think that this money was raised to spend on DTRocky9-9/16/2004
7721Is there anyone who believes sepr will be profitable in 2005 (as they project)? rkrw-9/16/2004
7720>> New Converts - now we know why they did the purchases:>> Yes, inIcebrg-9/16/2004
7719I'm out sold after hours, will play this one in the option market. Interestijayhawk969-9/16/2004
7718Ugh. Whomever predicted a prelude to another cv offering wins the prize :-) rkrw-9/16/2004
7717New Converts - now we know why they did the purchases: MARLBOROUGH, Mass., SeptRocky9-9/16/2004
7716No, I never saw the Stanford report. PeterBiomaven-9/15/2004
7715I commented on some of the reviews I read on her book here: Message 20493408 BBiomaven-9/15/2004
7714Hi, Peter, Did you ever weigh in publicly with reaction to the Stanford researcquidditch-9/15/2004
7713A CONVERSATION WITH | MARCIA ANGELL <b>A Doctor Puts the Drug Industry UnDavid C. Burns-9/15/2004
7712"Are you concerned about protection prior to 12.4, or just post 12.4."Rocky9-9/14/2004
7711Are you concerned about protection prior to 12.4, or just post 12.4. I'm wijayhawk969-9/14/2004
7710Continuation of conversions... Item 3.02. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securitrkrw-9/14/2004
7709I'm buying more puts today. First ones past the Dec '04 date. They areRocky9-9/13/2004
7708Because SEPR was essentially paying for these bonds with the conversion feature Biomaven-9/11/2004
7707"Because they are like long-dated well-in-the-money calls." I guess tRocky9-9/11/2004
7706Here's an example of what I meant about what I consider the theoretically coBiomaven-9/11/2004
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News