SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
IBM
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
8220 178 0 IBM
Emcee:  Dave Lyall Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
7769My guess is that investors with sufficient capital to move the stock looked closRobert Scott Diver-7/19/2002
7768It is true I do not do much cheerleading. I try to provide candid appraisals ofArrow Hd.-7/19/2002
7767i do wonder about there books. but i did buy oct calls the day before yesterday Tim Davies-7/18/2002
7766The GAAP number was clearly reported. It was the lead number reported. In any caRobert Scott Diver-7/18/2002
7765The issue is not clear reporting but switching to pro-forma consensus when GerstArrow Hd.-7/18/2002
7764People seem to be complaining about IBM's clear presentation of earnings andRobert Scott Diver-7/18/2002
7763RSD, you know as well as I that IBM has been reporting GAAP earnings for the lasArrow Hd.-7/18/2002
7762By Peter Eavis Special to TheStreet.com 07/17/2002 08:47 PM EDT thestreet.com TTim Davies-7/18/2002
7761There seems to be a lot of complaints on other threads about how the ibm earningTim Davies-7/18/2002
7760I believe that it is treated in one of two ways: (1) the shares are held as &quoSeeker2007-7/17/2002
7759Share Buyback Question Quick Question - When IBM (or any other company for that bob gauthier-7/17/2002
7758Arrow, Thanks for the response. Perhaps I will follow up on your suggestions. ISeeker2007-7/17/2002
7757Listened to most of the conference call. Suggest you review the webcast slides. Robert Scott Diver-7/17/2002
7756It is interesting to see consensus numbers switch from GAAP reporting to pro-forArrow Hd.-7/17/2002
7755I really have no idea. However, bad news often comes in more than one slug, so John Koligman-7/17/2002
7754will ibm meet targets or come in low and tank into the low 60's? timTim Davies-7/16/2002
7753Arrow, I seem to recall it had passed the 6k level, but not by much. Best regarJohn Koligman-7/16/2002
7752Correction: Interest Rates are lower so the market is more under valued now pluKirk ©-7/16/2002
7751<B>Irrational Pessimism??? </b> In 1996, the FED model said the Kirk ©-7/16/2002
7750Interesting, I wonder where the DOW was when he made those comments.Arrow Hd.-7/16/2002
7749Arrow, my prediction is that when the DOW hits the point at which Greenspan madeJohn Koligman-7/15/2002
7748Ashish, I don't know if IR monitors this board or any Internet sites for thaArrow Hd.-7/15/2002
7747Arrow, IBM has about 1.7 bn shares outstanding and would have had about 2.4 billSeeker2007-7/14/2002
7746i agree , the long calls are growing.. and im going to join them. the stock is rTim Davies-7/11/2002
7745Could be getting near a bottom here. I think if there was going to be a warningArrow Hd.-7/10/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News