SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Jim's Nasdaq100 Special as a basket.
An SI Board Since February 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2103 37 0 QQQQ
Emcee:  James F. Hopkins Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
778 Hi All! QQQ BP remains at 45%. OT: Number of total bearish chart patterns chartseer-5/29/1999
777 Jim: I agree with your view. But I covered my short today before the last minutCompadre-5/28/1999
776 FredE: No, I was short till 15 min. before the close and covered. I think it isCompadre-5/28/1999
775 Jamie; Note 5 min before the close the Futures fell off a cliff ( to late for tJames F. Hopkins-5/28/1999
774 Jamie, did you get long again? Stoctrash-5/28/1999
773 Jeffrey: I would agree to that except that the volume was dismal yesterday alsoCompadre-5/28/1999
772 This is a holilday weekend, I would suspect low volume may have something to doJack of All Trades-5/28/1999
771 Jim: The QQQ appears as though it is being shorted right now. It is going for 1Compadre-5/28/1999
770 Jim: The 10 day EMA on the NDX is falling fast and cross over the 55 day EMA 2 Compadre-5/28/1999
769 Jaime; Correction, I just talked the a FUND accountant at waterhouse looks likeJames F. Hopkins-5/28/1999
768 Jim: Thanks. That's good to know. Regards, Jaime Compadre-5/28/1999
767 I think they may have gone through....then when they realized those were bad prStoctrash-5/28/1999
766 FredE: If they were bad ticks...Jim should have never received a confirmation!!HairBall-5/28/1999
765 Jim...I think those were bad ticks...I saw them also yesterday. If so..then youStoctrash-5/28/1999
764 That's what they told me yesterday, at waterhouse.. may not be with others,James F. Hopkins-5/28/1999
763 Jim: **OT** Well, I have never gotten satisfaction with E*Trade, no matter howHairBall-5/28/1999
762 Jim: Did you mean that you could switch for free at a broker? Regards, Jaime Compadre-5/28/1999
761 Jim: Yes, you can only do that if you have an account with them, and you can swCompadre-5/28/1999
760 Jamie; I remember you speaking of fund switchers..now I have never really got iJames F. Hopkins-5/28/1999
759 Les; I down loaded the whole mess, even the fully executed order, but he told mJames F. Hopkins-5/28/1999
758 Hi LG; I just never had something like taht happen before, a fill that was takeJames F. Hopkins-5/28/1999
757 Jim: That sounds like E*Trade...sue those a$$ holes... The only reason I neverHairBall-5/27/1999
756 Nail them Jim...that is BS. Tape your calls or something...... In 10 years+ I&Stoctrash-5/27/1999
755 Don't you get a confirmation number that can be used as proof? Les H-5/27/1999
754 Take away my bingo..they recanted the order , AFTER I got a conformation on itJames F. Hopkins-5/27/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News