SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
A Neutral Corner
An SI Board Since September 2005
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
2253 11 0
Emcee:  Constant Reader Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
778Thanks. Looks like Bennett's introduction of race was accurate, but unnecessBill-9/30/2005
777<I>I was unable to grow up to be president because my name ended in an i.&Bill-9/30/2005
776I have always maintained that I was unable to grow up to be president because myRambi-9/30/2005
775<i> they did not put forth Bennett’s race-based argument.</i> Good Lane3-9/30/2005
774I just added up the different categories listed for convenience - the actual resConstant Reader-9/30/2005
773<i>55.5% of black women are single (never married) or divorced. The othersLane3-9/30/2005
772Yes, I just reread the section and you are correct: his argument is based on socConstant Reader-9/30/2005
771well actually it does.... but not in the sense that the name itself necessarilyMulhollandDrive-9/30/2005
770Re: Naming: We both need to read it again because I am pretty sure he concluded Constant Reader-9/30/2005
769i'm not sure the reason that race per se was left out of the chapter in the MulhollandDrive-9/30/2005
768Thanks. Bennett certainly did himself no favors in that exchange. The Media MattConstant Reader-9/30/2005
767<i>I think MD's calling it "code" is right. And probably wheMulhollandDrive-9/30/2005
766Here's the exchange with the caller: From the September 28 broadcast of SalRambi-9/30/2005
765I understand that the actual 1999 paper written by Leavitt was more specific aboConstant Reader-9/30/2005
764Whoops- this was supposed to be to Karen--- MD's article referenced an earlRambi-9/30/2005
763Thank you for outlining the context of his statements. Amazing that it has eludeBill-9/30/2005
762i recently read the book, and i do not recall him specify 'black' as a nMulhollandDrive-9/30/2005
761he is careful not to specify a particular race, but he states quite clearly thatMulhollandDrive-9/30/2005
760Adding more detail to my reply: According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, in 2Constant Reader-9/30/2005
759Now this is interesting-- <i>the women most likely to seek an abortion --Rambi-9/30/2005
758Bennett was referencing Freakonomics (which I finally bought but haven't reaRambi-9/30/2005
757one has to wonder if apparently he'd been reading 'freakonmics' theMulhollandDrive-9/30/2005
756According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, black women accounted for 35.7% of leConstant Reader-9/30/2005
755<b>People have an unfortunate way of saying things sometimes that can be vMary Cluney-9/30/2005
754Did you see the context in which he said it? Someone offered an argument about Lane3-9/30/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):