SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Bill Wexler's Dog Pound
An SI Board Since March 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol SI Sentiment
10293 141 0 REFR ★★★★★ (Strong Buy)
Emcee:  Bill Wexler Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
7793Bill--I believe one of your old favorite people is getting some attention. I seeDruss-2/1/2001
7792You are both wrong then. Of that, I am 100% certain. Listen Bill, I worked in golden_tee -2/1/2001
7791Oh. I have a feeling his facts are perfectly straight. Actually, you could sayBill Wexler-2/1/2001
7790Uhhh... could it be because he is paid to write such articles? Naw, the would bgolden_tee -2/1/2001
7789Hi Bobby, Looks like a little light is being shined on a big cockroach. Any clBill Wexler-2/1/2001
7788XRX-hmmm, maybe I need to do more thinking about it. I bought just a tad today.Bill Wexler-2/1/2001
7787Golly Gee. I wonder why VLNC is suddenly on Herb's radar again?Bill Wexler-2/1/2001
7786If we can't summon the demons of GUMM anymore, maybe we could try our old frKevin Podsiadlik-2/1/2001
7785"...he must have hands strong enough to crush a piece of charcoal into a diHank-2/1/2001
7784Between all the wanking and the time he spends on the keyboard writing novels abBill Wexler-1/31/2001
7783Excellent plan Bill! I'm sure if Wasatch and GUMM pool their resources theyHank-1/31/2001
7782I loved the stock photo they used of two people standing in front of a Learjet. Bill Wexler-1/31/2001
7781wsph - I believe some readers will find their medical claims "interesting&qBen Wa-1/30/2001
7780I don't understand the home builders that well, and I'm puzzled by real-Bill Wexler-1/30/2001
7779Bill W. inre: <i>"There are banks, there are cyclicals, etc."<Bill Ulrich-1/30/2001
7778XRX - I remember and I have been watching it from time to time. They are takingBill Wexler-1/29/2001
7777Bill W. The post to which I'm responding is yours from a year ago inre: XRXBill Ulrich-1/29/2001
7776gummmmmmm.......yawn. noot even 1hypestersaróund. Markets must be in a bigRockyBalboa-1/29/2001
7775Congrats, Bill on the lucky COVD outcome.... you know, others were not that lucRockyBalboa-1/29/2001
7774COVD-----despite my earlier bravado, I find it difficult to leave a huge gain unBill Wexler-1/29/2001
7773Guess what else? My opinion about GES has changed....as of this morning? ComplBill Wexler-1/29/2001
7772HeeHee Had to laugh at that one!!Bill Wexler-1/26/2001
7771CHECK CHECK 1-2-3-4 CHECK CHECK GUMM IS A FRAUD CHECK 1-2-3-4 GUMM IS A Hank-1/26/2001
7770Wow almost 50 minutes since you posted about GUMM and no replies yet. Someone mDale Baker-1/25/2001
7769It's unbelievable how outlandish frauds like Biotime can remain airballs forBill Wexler-1/25/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News