SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Sepracor-Looks very promising
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10280 115 0 SEPR
Emcee:  rkrw Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
780510-Q--some new snippets (couldn't copy from the Adobe file): Expects to cloquidditch-11/9/2004
7804Sounds great. I'm there. Dr. Please, please gimmee some of that stuff.scaram(o)uche-11/9/2004
7803Nytorra sounds like storebrand Nyquil. A lunesta, what do you think, crazy half rkrw-11/9/2004
7802UCB expects US successor to Zyrtec before year-end Tue Nov 9, 2004 01:00 PM ET Icebrg-11/9/2004
7801Guffaw!!scaram(o)uche-11/9/2004
7800<i>filo's characterization fits lunesta, with that small European counRCMac-11/9/2004
7799zetonna and lunesta--these are hysterical. I go with filo: <<I have alwayquidditch-11/9/2004
7798<i>zetonna</i> - awful, sounds like a race car. <i>lunesta<Biomaven-11/8/2004
7797zetonna.com also registered 31Aug2004. lunesta.com registered back in Oct 2003. bio_kruncher-11/8/2004
7796I have always thought Estorra sounded too much like a small European or former-SFiloF-11/8/2004
7795<i>Nytorra.com domain was registered by SEPR on 31AUG2004</i> That Biomaven-11/8/2004
7794There has been recent internet domain registration activity from SEPR. Nytorra.cbio_kruncher-11/8/2004
7793<i>It's been discussed at cafepharma.</i> OK - means it's sBiomaven-11/7/2004
7792It's been discussed at cafepharma. Could have been post launch like Andrx.rkrw-11/7/2004
7791One possibility is it's <i>Alora</i> that may be the culprit. BuBiomaven-11/7/2004
7790Well I've done a bit of research, and it seems there is a final review on a Biomaven-11/7/2004
7789to see some of the other possible names, go here <I> uspto.gov </I>software salesperson-11/7/2004
7788<i>when did the FDA get into the business of picking trade names?</i>Biomaven-11/7/2004
7787when did the FDA get into the business of picking trade names? What is their isDavid C. Burns-11/7/2004
7786Appears estorra tradename was nixed by FDA, so they must be scrambling to pick arkrw-11/7/2004
7785Adding my chances of the outcome and correcting my typing: Outcome - Price Dec Rocky9-11/6/2004
7784sold the stock and bought a 2.5x position.. : Yes, I like that move, but too pusfred hayes-11/6/2004
7783Outcome - Price Dec - Price Jan .75 Approval - 67 - 73 .15 Delay again, no testsjayhawk969-11/6/2004
7782Topics in Adult Primary Care - Insomnia Expert Column Long-term Management of InIcebrg-11/6/2004
7781"your post approval price of 22 for January" Nope - I can't type Rocky9-11/5/2004
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):