SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
SLJB - Sulja Brothers Building Supply, Inc.
An SI Board Since September 2006
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1681 30 0 SLJB
Emcee:  Done, gone. Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
781Michal - that's your opinion but we both know you are obsessed with personalrrufff-11/28/2006
780What I quoted from your post is 100% false: Message 23051522 She claimed it, nDone, gone.-11/28/2006
779Been on SI since early 1998. More SLJB things to ponder. Consultech ConstructiJim Bishop-11/28/2006
778My post wasn't false. It was what I read here. There was a poster, perhapsrrufff-11/28/2006
777Ask them. I don't speak for others. I only pointed out your false claim: Done, gone.-11/28/2006
776I didn't say that you made any claims. Unlike others, I don't accuse. I&rrufff-11/28/2006
775Jeff, I believe this was posted originally on IHub and it may have been deleted scion-11/28/2006
774<i>claims, claims, claims - guilty until proven innocent??</i> NoDone, gone.-11/28/2006
773Did the poster who claimed to be a resigned attorney indicate there was a "rrufff-11/28/2006
772So, Jeff, are you saying that exoskeletal was involved in the scam? Wow - greatrrufff-11/28/2006
771Where did she say anyone altered a check? I think she denied that claim?rrufff-11/28/2006
770Didn't I see a post where the subject of an altered check was brought up? crrufff-11/28/2006
769That's something else I find odd - a $143.00 deposit for equipment costing $scion-11/28/2006
768wow you guys got the juicy stuff hereBuckey-11/28/2006
767Hedley John Coates Message 23046174scion-11/28/2006
766If the RCMP was involved in investigating passing a fraudulent cheque there has scion-11/28/2006
765Someone get a hold of John Coates and point him to this thread :). - JeffJeffrey S. Mitchell-11/28/2006
764That is odd, scionist. One would not think she would lose track of someone who &Star the Wonder Pup-11/28/2006
763<i>In May of 2000, he was selling some machinery and needed to settle debtscion-11/28/2006
762To recap, according to exoskeletal, a $143.00 deposit was put down for a $143,00Jeffrey S. Mitchell-11/28/2006
761I'm sure Cameila had no chance of convincing the bank that it was their erroscion-11/28/2006
760<i> What you are saying does not seem to be fraud, criminal or anything siDone, gone.-11/28/2006
759Scionanist seemed to ask you if Petar altered a check. A take it your answer warrufff-11/28/2006
758That's good, since Cameila-Nash may be able to tell us more of Vucicevichscion-11/28/2006
757That's new. Shortly after her last post her profile said her limit was 5 poDone, gone.-11/28/2006
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):