SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Depotech(depo)
An SI Board Since January 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
887 2 0 DEPO
Emcee:  trevor john wilkinson Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
787 Where is DepoMorphine in the FDA process? I'm guilty of losing track of itJZGalt-3/31/1998
786 This used to be an informative and civil thread. It appears that bad times seemDr. John M. de Castro-3/31/1998
785 Nobody has mentioned what Chiron's part may have been in this. Chiron is ceBD-3/31/1998
784 Interesting info, thanks. I checked the original protocol (fda.gov). The steroiStockDoc-3/31/1998
783 Thanks for helping me realize my "percentage losses" Mr. Richard &quoBob Barels-3/30/1998
782 <<Off Topic>> Lets see. DEPO goes from $15/sh to $3/sh and is panneseminole-3/30/1998
781 thanks, Some details I know and most of the finer medical, I don't. But wtechbull-3/30/1998
780 Glad to hear Bob & Tom have squared things. Usually don't comment on peBD-3/30/1998
779 Tom, as I mentioned in the other thread I do not blame you for my losses. I hadBob Barels-3/30/1998
778 You obviously know more about the details than I do. Here's some more thougStockDoc-3/30/1998
777 Tom and Jim, good points, both. I fault myself for accepting the story of DepoJohn Metcalf-3/29/1998
776 Thanks for the support. I have traded private e-mails with Bob since his andTom D-3/29/1998
775 Tom, Actually Tom, your comments helped as well as those from a Doctor I know James Silverman-3/29/1998
774 Your attitude in last two posts on this thread is one of critisism and condemnaBD-3/29/1998
773 Good morning Bob....I wish you would reconsider your position on talking with tgeorge m. miller-3/29/1998
772 I have been listening to your conversation and I feel I have a few things to adtechbull-3/29/1998
771 Since you have asked me to use my Ph.D. to do my own research here is my recommBob Barels-3/29/1998
770 Dear Dr. D: In the DEPO case, you worked with incorrect data, thus your concluStockDoc-3/29/1998
769 I can't blame it on a lack of time. If one believes the conference call onTom D-3/28/1998
768 Dear Dr. D. I admire your honesty. But don't blame yourself. Maybe you did StockDoc-3/28/1998
767 Am no longer investing....at least for a while. No longer have any capital forTom D-3/27/1998
766 > I will take my original position and sell for a tax loss.< This shouldStockDoc-3/27/1998
765 DEPO Shareholders I am thinking about doubling my position in DEPO. Depending seminole-3/25/1998
764 Not much to report but thought you might find this post of intrest off the CSTLBD-3/20/1998
763 Dr. John - Thank you for your very clear analysis of the research process on DeCharger-3/16/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):