NAAC - National Affiliated Corp. $1 and Moving to $10

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks
NAAC - National Affiliated Corp. $1 and Moving to $10

An SI Board Since September 1997

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
1587	1	0	NAAC

Emcee: timemizer	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
787	James , for what its worth; The 3 miilion is the 3 mm that he wont have to repa	paper man	-	7/11/1998
786	I agree with you 100%. Lets not forget the business that NAAC is in. Insurance	daaan	-	7/11/1998
785	Listen, I've been a big NAAC fan for a while, and I think you guys are the	MonteChristo	-	7/10/1998
784	And the choir said AMEN!	MonteChristo	-	7/10/1998
783	I have a large position in this company. NAAC management owes it to us to mak	Rock Bottom	-	7/10/1998
782	I think the last two posts, Bobb's and stockster's, fit my position exa	Sam Matz	-	7/10/1998
781	Glen - As I indicated in my earlier post, you are more informed than most of us	stockster	-	7/10/1998
780	Glen: I have followed you posts in the past with eagerness and appreciation. I	Bobb	-	7/10/1998
779	Paperman, " looking between .50 and .60 for the accum lavele." Only	RADARLUV	-	7/10/1998
778	Fellow investors I have spent much time researching and evaluating this situati	GlenRP	-	7/10/1998
777	I am long NAAC and hope your right but there is no way they can buy another com	daaan	-	7/10/1998
776	This whole situation sounds a little too familiar. Could it be that: Deloitte	James	-	7/10/1998
775	No negative effect whatsoever. We may see another aqu. before you knowit. NAAC	paper man	-	7/10/1998
774	I too will accumualte.. Thats all this will be is " a window for accumulat	paper man	-	7/10/1998
773	One more question......... How do these problems.....whether percieved or real	Xavier	-	7/10/1998
772	Ok, so what does this all mean? MC - Are you implying that JL&Co know wha	stockster	-	7/10/1998
771	Thanks, all, for your truly helpful responses. They seemed to soothe me. Don&	Sam Matz	-	7/10/1998
770	Go to the JL&Co web site and look at Johnson's profile. You don't t	MonteChristo	-	7/9/1998
769	Hey Sam I just identified certain conditions about you that make me concerned a	GlenRP	-	7/9/1998
768	I would to if i were J & L. As an auditor, I would see NAACs condition as s	paper man	-	7/9/1998
767	Responding would just add validity to an otherwise worthless piece of paper. I	GlenRP	-	7/9/1998
766	<JL&Co has identified certain conditions that raise substantial doubt ab	Sam Matz	-	7/9/1998
765	I dont see anything stinky! Lambert and Johnson were not qualified to manage th	paper man	-	7/9/1998
764	NAAC must issue a response to the auditor's allegations immediately. Remai	Rock Bottom	-	7/9/1998
763	MC, It appears that stinky is a kind word. I don't much care for accoun	walleye	-	7/9/1998

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):