SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry
An SI Board Since January 2004
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
81568 36 0
Emcee:  ChinuSFO Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromPosted
79168Oil is the whale blubber of our century. It needs to go. The only free clean eneAmerican Spirit8/28/2006
79167 Well it might be hard on those that own a lot of Exxon stock, if we tried to tTimF8/28/2006
79166en.wikipedia.orgTimF8/28/2006
79165tough when you own a lot of exxon stock eh? to see the horrific price for this sSkywatcher8/28/2006
79164keep supporting the scumbag...Skywatcher8/28/2006
79163 Exxon's making large profits because oil makes a lot more economic sense fTimF8/28/2006
791621 - Money from his clients was used for corrupt purposes <b>and more impoTimF8/28/2006
79161Solar and wind power programs are WORTH IT. We'd save trillions over time. American Spirit8/28/2006
79160Wrong. Abramoff's scams and his pockets. Not a single dime from Abramoff or American Spirit8/28/2006
79159 It has to be massive if its going to do something like let the US get by withoTimF8/28/2006
79158 Using highly compressed air to power cars is similar to using electricity or tTimF8/28/2006
79157Doesn't have to be massive. It has to be significantly high enough to starsea_biscuit8/28/2006
79156OIL is going down one way or the other if WE the people have anything to do withSkywatcher8/28/2006
79155Just try putting a zillion solar panels in the desert...the environmentalist likTopCat8/28/2006
79154 <i> The transition I am thinking about is more in the way of increased puTimF8/28/2006
79153 No its not misleading, what's misleading is your assertion that only moneyTimF8/28/2006
79152<i> Desert land owned by the government is free </i> TANSTAAFL TimF8/28/2006
79151"Abramoff clients" is deliberately misleading. It's a big fat RNC-American Spirit8/28/2006
79150Desert land owned by the government is free, and should be offered for free to aAmerican Spirit8/28/2006
79149 No real estate is free. There is always some cost of some sort to use it. BuTimF8/28/2006
79148Compliant and subservient: Jimmy Carter's explosive critique of Tony Blair Richnorth8/28/2006
79147Quit repeating that lie, you deliberate criminal accomplice.American Spirit8/28/2006
79146Abramoff had ZERO to do with democrats, nothing. The RNC lie makes the leap thaAmerican Spirit8/28/2006
79145 Abramoff's clients gave money to the Dems. About 1/3rd of the Abramoff moTimF8/28/2006
79144 Once again Message 22750181 Its hardly like the whole world of corruption iTimF8/28/2006
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News