SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
ROSS SYSTEMS a turnaround?
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3067 14 0 ROSS
Emcee:  Jim Malone Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
792 And, don't forget, on '97 earnings, Ross IS value play. Some of us areGreg h2o-4/14/1997
791 Joe, Software companies usually have a higher PE and that is accepted much likeAlice M Bryant-4/14/1997
790 As a 'value' investor who moved into a 50% cash position and am nibblinJoe Schmoe-4/14/1997
789 Does anyone know the date when ROSS announces earnings for the quarter?Robert Parkinson-4/13/1997
788 Alice, I think I have to agree with you, ROSS will be a strong stock someday. ARobert Parkinson-4/13/1997
787 I believe the "Value Investors" will be buying Ross soon. The softwarAlice M Bryant-4/13/1997
786 Murphy new CTSL, in mail now, has serious self-critique of his and tech sectorsbob zagorin-4/13/1997
785 >>also he hasn't recommended nay networking stocks and many of them aXingbo Wang-4/12/1997
784 Even if ROSS does make their numbers this time around (and I agree with you - tRobert Parkinson-4/10/1997
783 i think murphy has been visiting several si threads under the name "techpebob zagorin-4/10/1997
782 The law of averages would suggest that he might be right this time.David L. Brown-4/10/1997
781 Well, Michael Murphy on his CTSL hotline just gave ROSS the "kiss of deathRobert Parkinson-4/9/1997
780 note, however, that the vohs message says that the purchaser ``frequently'&superdow-4/9/1997
779 I believe you are....without actually checking at this moment....I think even fGreg h2o-4/9/1997
778 Greg, look at the activity leading up to last quarter earnings announcement. NDavid L. Brown-4/9/1997
777 I disagree. A $325k contract, while not material for this quarter, is obviouslGreg h2o-4/9/1997
776 It is a standard, simple and acknowledged practice that when you make your numbseth thomas-4/9/1997
775 Yeah, that was my thought, too. Given that Vohs earlier said it takes a few weseth thomas-4/9/1997
774 Robert, after the mishap in revs and earnings last quarter, the analysts are sadavesd-4/9/1997
773 Robert, Ross was selling at near its recent high at 9 1/8 on Jan. 24 just priorDavid L. Brown-4/8/1997
772 If you look at what happened last quarter, there aren't any "big boys&David L. Brown-4/8/1997
771 Shouldn't we start seeing more strength in the stock with all of the contraRobert Parkinson-4/8/1997
770 Or it could just simply mean that it was signed and booked after March 31. In Greg h2o-4/8/1997
769 Its interesting to note that vohs says in today's 325,000 contract announcesuperdow-4/8/1997
768 Glad to hear you're going to keep a long-term view.... Keep in mind, the SGreg h2o-4/8/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):