SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
BMC Software
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1492 34 0 BMCS
Emcee:  Srini Raman Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
792 CA is up over a point. It's not the sector. Chuzzlewit-4/5/1999
791 >>No news from any of the brokerages.<< Merryln Lynch getting outAlienTech-4/5/1999
790 No news from any of the brokerages. TTFN, CTC Chuzzlewit-4/5/1999
789 >>but then looked at DCTM and decided against it << There is a diAlienTech-4/5/1999
788 >>This looks like insanity! I don't see any news. Do You know what&#AlienTech-4/5/1999
787 almost pulled the trigger but then looked at DCTM and decided against it Susan Saline-4/5/1999
786 This looks like insanity! I don't see any news. Do You know what's goinChuzzlewit-4/5/1999
785 Before you blame me let me say, I had nothing to do with it. but someoen sure iAlienTech-4/5/1999
784 Edwarda, you are making me blush!!! Outlook for software companies is soft: cChuzzlewit-4/4/1999
783 Maurice, how kind of you! Thanks! And we are all thankful to have Chuzz back-Edwarda-4/3/1999
782 Yep, and if you send three ... Where's Lou? I need the last question answeChuzzlewit-4/3/1999
781 Hey Chuzz--we are the one to thank you for the debate with Edwarda (back and foMAURICE J. SADOWSKY-4/3/1999
780 >>Maurice, thank you so much for your support. As you have undoubtedly dAlienTech-4/3/1999
779 Maurice, thank you so much for your support. As you have undoubtedly discoveredChuzzlewit-4/3/1999
778 My attempt to explain to Maurice was "squidded" for so long that I fiEdwarda-4/3/1999
777 >>I'll explain in my next posting.<< Hey dont get all bent ouAlienTech-4/3/1999
776 Maurice, dear, 1. Turn on the inbox feature and read--if they are still thereEdwarda-4/3/1999
775 Edwarda--my correct e mail address is in my profile--Chuzz made the correct assMAURICE J. SADOWSKY-4/3/1999
774 Thanks, dear Chuzz! I hadn't even thought to ask this of Maurice! I have Edwarda-4/3/1999
773 Maurice, I think Edwarda has been trying to send you private messages. You may Chuzzlewit-4/3/1999
772 Maybe we finally move in the right direction with respect to employee stock optChuzzlewit-4/3/1999
771 Edwarda, in my defense I point out that decent analysis frequently depends on sChuzzlewit-4/2/1999
770 Edwarda, I will always fight when I believe I am correct. I will cede when I amChuzzlewit-4/2/1999
769 Chuzz--not certain what you mean by private messages--don't think I have reMAURICE J. SADOWSKY-4/2/1999
768 And don't cede to me so quickly! Your points are well taken in an understaEdwarda-4/2/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News