SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Starnet (SNMM)Online gaming, sexsites, lottery, Sportsbook
An SI Board Since September 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
8858 31 0 SNMM
Emcee:  David A. Lethe Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
7933 Thomas, I would agree with that statement...Perhaps you can expand on a Class AGator-10/19/1999
7932 Lets beat the dead horse once again, aint gonna change SNMM's destiny..a biAnthony@Pacific-10/19/1999
7931 "Chances are the vast majority of people who reportedly would testify on bJack Turner-10/19/1999
7930 NEWS FLASH -- NASD states A@P suffers from SERIOUS MENTAL ILLNESS Get the factJack Turner-10/19/1999
7929 There are a couple different issues regarding the proposed class action lawsuitTHOMAS GOODRICH-10/19/1999
7928 Thomas, Good question: Where is Levy??? Was he the one that fed all the informaGator-10/19/1999
7927 Thomas, Levy sure was proud by publishing the Class Action on his site, as he gGator-10/19/1999
7926 STARNET'S BIG PROBLEM used to be Gambling Magazine! Has anyone seen or hTHOMAS GOODRICH-10/19/1999
7925 Bob, Once the personal vendetta (i.e., Levy, and possibly, those RCMP officialsGator-10/19/1999
7924 I guess we all know who they work for. Maybe we should rename them? ANY IDEASbob lange-10/19/1999
7923 Anyone hear from Gambling Magazine? Where are they at a time like this? Did theTHOMAS GOODRICH-10/18/1999
7922 <b>GAMING STOCKS (10-18-99) THE DAY IN REVIEW....</b> Two Stock hefishing1-10/18/1999
7921 I guess the good news about the class action suit is that Lawyers don't suBobInBush-10/18/1999
7920 Mo, Thanks. I have too much on the line to take 30% drops from day to day (theTechplayer-10/18/1999
7919 I agree Brian about the adult sites. however the horses might be delayed by a cinteresting man-10/18/1999
7918 Class-Action lawsuit probably won't amount to anything like many other suchTHOMAS GOODRICH-10/18/1999
7917 1,437,000 trade so far looks like class action is no concern for investors thatMark Chamberlain-10/18/1999
7916 Looks like some more crooked lawyers taking a 99.5% fee for shaking down a comBobInBush-10/18/1999
7915 Mo, 10% of self-imposed rule kicked in Friday after the ruling was announced, Techplayer-10/18/1999
7914 DD on SNMM would have pointed out that the stock at 3.06 was a steal. This linkMark Chamberlain-10/18/1999
7913 GODZILLA is beginning to rumble!interesting man-10/18/1999
7912 Shows your lack of knowledge of class actions, this one will not fly. Insiders Mark Chamberlain-10/18/1999
7911 you are the loser.....i guess ya didn't own any of this pos when it was twetrader14U-10/18/1999
7910 Mark, Now up 60% from Friday's close. Brian Techplayer-10/18/1999
7909 Looks like others felt the same way about SNMM up 35.% today. So I guess zero Mark Chamberlain-10/18/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):