SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
QUANTUM
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
9124 27 0 QNTM
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
7949 He hasn't given me a reason not to trust him. I always make my own decisioSmilodon-6/12/1998
7948 "And, I did get a sales call from Robertson today on Quantum." Could Sam-6/12/1998
7947 I think the meeting is over today. It may have been yesterday. I think it wasSmilodon-6/12/1998
7946 When will the meeting end, do you know? Who's there? Will there be a tape rSam-6/12/1998
7945 Lehman also has been calling QNTM best positioned for a recovery in DD. They mSamuraiSam-6/12/1998
7944 Robertson Stephens is still positive on Quantum. See the tape drive and high eSmilodon-6/12/1998
7943 "Does anyone have any idea why QNTM is crashing?" Has to be fear of QSam-6/12/1998
7942 Does anyone have any idea why QNTM is crashing besides WDC earnings that came oJungleCat-6/12/1998
7941 $300 PC? Does it have any means of data input or output? I'm assuming nToko-6/12/1998
7940 Doug, They haven't made open market purchases, but they have, according to Sam-6/12/1998
7939 I guess this makes insider holding close to zero.RealMuLan-6/12/1998
7938 I don't remember seeing this posted before but it may well have. Latest InDebt Free-6/11/1998
7937 I don't have any position right now. I got burned by this stock badly, lostRealMuLan-6/11/1998
7936 Commercial use for $300 dollar computer? Storage needs to rise exponentially? Jeff Egg-6/11/1998
7935 Sub-$300 PC? exchange2000.comRealMuLan-6/11/1998
7934 <All in all QNTM seems to be holding up relatively decently here doesn'tToko-6/11/1998
7933 Doug, RELATIVELY <VVBG> rdrt -9% apm -14% wdc -27% More importantly,Tom Simpson-6/10/1998
7932 Tom, you said >All in all QNTM seems to be holding up relatively decently Debt Free-6/10/1998
7931 >Life wouldn't be nearly as much fun. Sure wouldn't Sam. And at leaTom Simpson-6/10/1998
7930 re: righteous cynicism Geez, where y'all pick up all these nasty habits? TFrodo Baxter-6/10/1998
7929 With today's move down in the stock, I have added to my position at 22. IJeff Egg-6/10/1998
7928 So maybe the DD industry isn't cyclical as much as it is cynical ;-} I likstill learning-6/10/1998
7927 Ah, "righteous cynicism". My favorite. Wherever would we be without iSam-6/10/1998
7926 Mark was the original speculator....I'm a mere counter-speculator. We'vTom Simpson-6/10/1998
7925 SL and GM, But check out the Drive thread. Mark, Tom or someone over there I foSam-6/10/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News