Microphonics Inc. (mrps) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks
Microphonics Inc. (mrps)

An SI Board Since March 1998

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
8189	18	0	MRPS

Emcee: matthew lamberson	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
7964	The only ones who got burned were the ones looking to get rich in a week. This	Mitch	-	10/29/1999
7963	I was surprised by yesterdays run up to .81. Don't know why it happened. Ba	scott bradley	-	10/29/1999
7962	TVA said they were testing the Microphonics monitoring system for it's usab	Mitch	-	10/28/1999
7961	Mitch, I'm all ears, what did TVA have to say? Well does anyone know wh	Zeus549	-	10/28/1999
7960	OT Charlie: Thanks for the kind words about Cambridge. It's certainly a b	Basildon Bond	-	10/28/1999
7959	vic no posts for an hour are you meditating? writing your memoirs? out buying a	charlie mcgeehan	-	10/28/1999
7958	I have recently corresponded with TVA regarding their relationship with Microph	Mitch	-	10/28/1999
7957	hey bond checking your profile i see you're from cambridge. i was there a f	charlie mcgeehan	-	10/28/1999
7956	Please answer the question, Mitch. What "research" have YOU done? Th	learnstocks	-	10/28/1999
7955	Cute Mitch Cute!!!!!! Try again. This didn't make the grade.	learnstocks	-	10/28/1999
7954	My research(and it has included contacts with many of the entities MRPS has an	Mitch	-	10/28/1999
7953	Mitch: For the benefit of any possible newcomers to this thread, would you care	Basildon Bond	-	10/28/1999
7952	It is impossible to discredit someone like you because you have never posted an	Mitch	-	10/27/1999
7951	Welcome back. We haven't had you weigh in since late August, if I remember	learnstocks	-	10/27/1999
7950	Please base your decisions on your opinions and I will mine. When you accuse me	learnstocks	-	10/27/1999
7949	learnstocks: Do you seriously believe what you write. I doubt many other inves	RADAR )))	-	10/27/1999
7948	<i>Whether his email is valid or not is totally irrelevant to me.</i&g	Mark McNew	-	10/27/1999
7947	When you reread my post and concluded that it was negative, then you were biase	learnstocks	-	10/27/1999
7946	learnstocks: I have reread your post, and your comments are certainly negative	RADAR )))	-	10/27/1999
7945	I am sorry that you felt your character was assassinated. My post had nothing	learnstocks	-	10/27/1999
7944	learnstocks: If you question the validity of the post then send an e.mail or a	RADAR )))	-	10/27/1999
7943	This post is puzzling for a number of reasons. 1. How can the writer ASSUME tha	learnstocks	-	10/27/1999
7942	Basildon, you are indeed DDMan! Hope you don't mind if I repost this: B	saigon69	-	10/27/1999
7941	E.mail response from Jimmy Gayle I sent two different letters to Jimmy Gayle o	RADAR )))	-	10/27/1999
7940	roberta you are right. i will continue to lurk and watch but am not buying agai	charlie mcgeehan	-	10/25/1999

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):