stamps.com (STMP) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
stamps.com (STMP)

An SI Board Since December 1998

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
1197	23	0	STMP

Emcee: Beltropolis Boy	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
797	I know what you mean. The stock should be much higher. ;-)	cmchang	-	11/1/1999
796	J.Y., The fact that the USPS sells stamps on line is a fundamental issue, but i	Craig Richards	-	11/1/1999
795	HOW LONG THIS INSANATI WILL LAST??? Arpad	arpad toth	-	11/1/1999
794	There no point in discussing fundamentals when talking about stocks like STMP.	J.Y. Wang	-	11/1/1999
793	One of the problems that stamps.com claims to solve is avoiding the time-wastin	Craig Richards	-	11/1/1999
792	You can't print stamps from the usps. you can buy them (yipee) but it'	cmchang	-	11/1/1999
791	<i>What will happen if US post start selling stamps and other services on	Craig Richards	-	11/1/1999
790	Excellent DD article "It's not illegal anymore Printing stamps at home	Wolff	-	11/1/1999
789	Brian, No Prob, stuff happens, back to the debate....eom	Wolff	-	11/1/1999
788	Ir RSSF is the only one holding it up, how long do you think they can keep doin	Michael Wong	-	11/1/1999
787	<i>You try to justify valuations while i go to the bank to deopsit profit	J.Y. Wang	-	10/31/1999
786	>> that justifying the current valuation of something by citing someone w	eDollar.com	-	10/31/1999
785	<i>A lesson on understanding English sentences may be more appropriate. C	J.Y. Wang	-	10/31/1999
784	<i>Stok market is not about immediate value, but future value. And for in	J.Y. Wang	-	10/31/1999
783	<i>So if something is valued at 100 of millions few months back tell me w	J.Y. Wang	-	10/31/1999
782	>>It's obvious you don't get the point. Perhaps you need to get a	eDollar.com	-	10/31/1999
781	>> What I am saying is that companies pay, and pay dearly, for those ads,	eDollar.com	-	10/31/1999
780	So if something is valued at 100 of millions few months back tell me why cant i	eDollar.com	-	10/31/1999
779	<i>Plently of them. One I remember is HOTJOBS.COM. It IPOed at 8.	J.Y. Wang	-	10/31/1999
778	Swamp land was worthless. Getting 10x that is easy. STMP was already in the hu	J.Y. Wang	-	10/31/1999
777	Brian I agree. Stamps executives must have hired some good economists to justif	eDollar.com	-	10/31/1999
776	We could also add Autobytel in the recent past or reach all the way back to the	Brian Malloy	-	10/31/1999
775	>>Did any company's stock go up because it paid extortionist rates fo	eDollar.com	-	10/31/1999
774	I guess one can pick almost any data point and say look this was the cause. Pe	Brian Malloy	-	10/31/1999
773	>>t would be like if Paul Allen bought some property for $100,000 and the	eDollar.com	-	10/31/1999

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):