SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Sepracor-Looks very promising
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10280 115 0 SEPR
Emcee:  rkrw Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
7980OT Peter, I strongly suspect that you are not the only revenue source Crichton Extra Pale-1/31/2005
7979(OT) <i>Whereas Peter was a nice guy, but. . . </i> <i>WherBiomaven-1/31/2005
7978OT: NY Times Book Review of Crichton's 'State of Fear' Message 2099Extra Pale-1/31/2005
7977<i>OT - This site seems quite good, and contains an analysis of Chrichton&Doc Bones-1/31/2005
7976OT OT OT Environment Just finished reading the latest Crichton thriller - fictRobohogs-1/30/2005
7975<i>Each asthma sufferer is assumed to use 2.5 MDIs each year</i> ha!Mike McFarland-1/30/2005
7974This was never a sensible way to protect the environment. Much better to tax CFCBiomaven-1/30/2005
7973Hi Peter, That is interesting and it is extremely well done. I find it hard tIRWIN JAMES FRANKEL-1/30/2005
7972quid, I've not seen any proposal from the FDA yet. Comments seem to still bBiomaven-1/29/2005
7971Peter, where do things stand re. proposed phase-out of the freon/gas propellant-quidditch-1/29/2005
7970>>Lunesta has surprised me. I don't quiet understand why it'd workIRWIN JAMES FRANKEL-1/29/2005
7969<i>some new compound they are very excited about, pulled it off the basemeBiomaven-1/29/2005
7968>> A lot going on, with the heavy hitter analysts asking multiple questionscaram(o)uche-1/27/2005
7967Did anyone catch the comment about some new compound they are very excited aboutRobohogs-1/27/2005
7966I am on vacation and my wife would kill me dead if I listen to the CC. But herekenhott-1/27/2005
7965I agree with rkrw's sense of this. I'm listening to the cc with half anquidditch-1/27/2005
7964Easy to overlook mdi pdufa date is in March, that's all upside; Arformoterolrkrw-1/27/2005
7963Pretty solid results - Lunesta still delayed but still expected to launch Q1. bRobohogs-1/27/2005
7962Thanks for posting that article. I'm sure many would benefit from changing A.J. Mullen-1/18/2005
7961Entry Material Agreement, Other Events Item 1.01. Entry into a Material DefinitA.J. Mullen-1/18/2005
7960Not so positive article on Lunesta in Washington Post: washingtonpost.comsjemmeri-1/18/2005
7959Thanks. So it is now on the price lists for some of the drug stores ahead of thRobohogs-1/18/2005
7958A bit of googling finds an Ambien AWP of $3.05 (10mg). county.org Retail At Ribio_kruncher-1/18/2005
7957Your recollection on pricing is the same as mine. Basically in line with AmbienRobohogs-1/17/2005
7956<i>>>Would you care to elaborate? <<</i> Racemic ZopiclDewDiligence_on_SI-1/17/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News