SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
JMAR Technologies(JMAR)
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
9695 80 0 JMAR
Emcee:  James Bowser Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
7995 Found some more links on JMAR: Looks like the people who designed JMAR's wBilberry-5/19/1999
7994 Gooch, some people look at the glass half empty and some half full. You are haBilberry-5/19/1999
7993 Are they semi-honest or pseudo-liars. Integrity - it ain't. They remind mGooch-5/19/1999
7992 JMAR doesn't lie, they just stretch the truth beyond normal boundaries. HelRichaaard-5/19/1999
7991 Yup, I agree with you there. But I don't think the big guys will crash andMesaba-5/19/1999
7990 Mesaba there are few little stocks that are doing well in this market. Its the Bilberry-5/19/1999
7989 Henry, that rumor is *BS in my opinion. That guy does not have much credibilitBilberry-5/19/1999
7988 FWIW - yahoo rumor posted of a JMAR buyout - probably some joker screwing withhenry jakala-5/19/1999
7987 MSFT v.s. JMAR Well folks, it's been almost 8 months since the friendly wagMesaba-5/19/1999
7986 maybe they'll partner with someone like an SVGI - this stock just doesn'QuietWon-5/18/1999
7985 Falstaff; You make a number of good points, and I wish companies were as upfrMJCok-5/18/1999
7984 Yes. I agree. JMAR is not a crooked operation by any means, and I am still a Falstaff-5/18/1999
7983 Falstaff, there was one paragraph that wasn't "misleading" at allMRothaus1-5/18/1999
7982 MJ: There are lies, then there are LIES. Because I did not make this distinctiFalstaff-5/18/1999
7981 Mostly motherhood; statements like this are general enough they don't reallFalstaff-5/18/1999
7980 well there's a big seller at 2 1/4 that appears to be trying to work JMAR dhenry jakala-5/18/1999
7979 Henry; Perhaps you could consider the following. Although I am also disappoiMJCok-5/17/1999
7978 so what do you make of martinez' closing comments - throwaway commentary ohenry jakala-5/17/1999
7977 Henry, Henry! Calm yourself. You should have a heart attack, you keep excitinFalstaff-5/17/1999
7976 more worthless news from martinez and crew and we're being swamped by a hughenry jakala-5/17/1999
7975 JMAR Technologies Receives $1.6 Million Order for Advanced Laser Semiconductor Paul Lee-5/17/1999
7974 The problem I see once again is that if JMAR wouldn't have gotten one contrMesaba-5/17/1999
7973 Doug, for these answers I would call the company. They can answer your specifiBilberry-5/14/1999
7972 Bilberry: Have they completed a Proto type. If so, where could I find details oDoug-5/14/1999
7971 Doug, no X-ray lithography will not be the only application of the x-ray sourceBilberry-5/14/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):