SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
LORAL -- Political Discussion
An SI Board Since May 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
880 2 0
Emcee:  Dragonfly Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
80 Rush? Who's Rush? At least you can be commended for standing on your prinhalfscot-5/24/1998
79 <i><b>right wing nazis</b> will crucify you if you dare exprehalfscot-5/24/1998
78 <i>Remember in the last election cycle the Dems signed up all those illegDragonfly-5/24/1998
77 Sure. If anyone manages to prove Clinton broke the law (remember, innocent untDragonfly-5/24/1998
76 <i>let me tell you that a poll tax is not the same thing as a political lDragonfly-5/24/1998
75 <i>When the chips fall where they may, and the truth comes out</i> halfscot-5/24/1998
74 You obviously haven't the native intelligence to know what is relevant. NoZoltan!-5/24/1998
73 I'm not suprised at the personal attacks-- you clearly have nothing of releDragonfly-5/24/1998
72 Ah, so you don't know what a poll tax is, do you? Dragonfly Dragonfly-5/24/1998
71 <i>No. I know that you are. Probably less.</i> Uh-huh. So the solDragonfly-5/24/1998
70 >><i>Then how can you dare question my knowledge of political histoZoltan!-5/24/1998
69 >><i>Do you think we are fools? </i> No. I know that you arZoltan!-5/24/1998
68 <i>Clinton will continue to get laid and lie about it.</i> Which iDragonfly-5/24/1998
67 <i>Remember in the last election cycle the Dems signed up all those illegDragonfly-5/24/1998
66 <i>It has been observed by political scientists and pollsters that DemocDragonfly-5/24/1998
65 <i>It is also a fact that Reagan did not appoint a majority of sitting FeDragonfly-5/24/1998
64 <<Dragonfly amply shows that we also need some form of political literacyccryder-5/24/1998
63 Let's not confuse the two issues which seem to be debated here, one is CliJim Parkinson-5/24/1998
62 >><i>Get out and VOTE!</i> Dragonfly proves that we need fewZoltan!-5/24/1998
61 >><i>Sorry. Reagan squeeked by in the popular vote.</i> WronZoltan!-5/24/1998
60 Typical response. You can continue to stick your head in the sand if you like jlallen-5/24/1998
59 Excuse me, a White House <b>intern</b> was in the white house! GolDragonfly-5/24/1998
58 Your reliance on personal attacks makes me question the validity of your positiDragonfly-5/24/1998
57 Yes, that's a good point. There really is not much diversity in the systemDragonfly-5/24/1998
56 <i>In fact, in 1984 Reagan won the greatest electoral landslide in US hiDragonfly-5/24/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):