SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
MFIC Corp. (MFIC)
An SI Board Since January 2004
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1150 40 0 MFIC
Emcee:  RikRichter Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
800will what you do not know could fill a ocean about MFIC. Some asset <<Pogeu Mahone-3/23/2006
799Dartboard stockpicking? lol check out when i first called MFIC a pos. hint MFPogeu Mahone-3/23/2006
798Thats a gasser! Thanks for the tip. Halliburton may be more fun! Not being Will Lyons-3/23/2006
797why would you short a 1.30 stock? your money is wasting time here and worse: fiPogeu Mahone-3/23/2006
796So are you suggesting we short it or buy something else. What do you have in miWill Lyons-3/23/2006
795Will please! AMAT is a supplier for the semi industry. ok but MFIC is a Pogeu Mahone-3/23/2006
794AMAT is a supplier for the semi industry and MFIC is a supplier for the nano iWill Lyons-3/23/2006
793MFIC =AMAT your killing me, but keep it up i need the laughs. thank you editPogeu Mahone-3/23/2006
792They only listed the nano producers not the equips! MFIC and SOTK are the AWill Lyons-3/23/2006
791rik they forgot to mention this pos MFIC! Must be too many fortune 500 companiPogeu Mahone-3/23/2006
790DRUG DISCOVERY Nanotechnology Drug-Delivery Companies Seeking to Partner with RikRichter-3/23/2006
789rik MFIC is going backwards look at ther newest earnings release. I thought yPogeu Mahone-3/16/2006
788Life sciences may hold first nanotech blockbuster Mass High Tech: The Journal oRikRichter-3/13/2006
787too bad for MFIC it will be years before anyone develops a nanomedicine.. tell Pogeu Mahone-3/11/2006
786Pharmaceutical companies now are investing in new sciences: biotechnology, genomRikRichter-3/11/2006
785saved by a stop loss out at 2.05 to 2.01.. nice ridePogeu Mahone-3/7/2006
784ya baby-BFG- -------Message #686 from Patentlawmeister at 12/30/2005 10:30:41 APogeu Mahone-3/7/2006
783News about growth prospects for carbon nanotubes with MFIC customer, Carbon NanoRikRichter-3/7/2006
782Nanoparticle/nanosturctured coatings news with BASF and FEIC. BASF ramping up nRikRichter-3/7/2006
781News about new MFIC director, George Uveges: TODAY ON PHARMALIVE.COM HarvardRikRichter-3/7/2006
780I sold EMFP waaaay too early!RikRichter-3/6/2006
779Hey rik any thoughts on this? finance.yahoo.com thanks Pogeu Mahone-3/6/2006
778From Drugdeliverytech.com: Breakthrough Ultraturbulent Reaction Technology OpeRikRichter-3/4/2006
777Irv Gruverman to speak at Particles 2006 conference: Particles 2006 Medical/BRikRichter-3/4/2006
776Nanomedicine from The Times: The Nano State Is Here: timesonline.co.ukRikRichter-2/25/2006
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News