SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
A Neutral Corner
An SI Board Since September 2005
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
2253 11 0
Emcee:  Constant Reader Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
803<b>But surely our English teachers all warned us that improper use of langMary Cluney-10/1/2005
802Pretty day for driving in the country. Hope you got to enjoy it in between inteLane3-10/1/2005
801I think I will do the simple sentence first, followed by the arms, and finally tIlaine-9/30/2005
800<i>It just seems the Dems are trying too hard to turn this into a major brIlaine-9/30/2005
799I don't think it was the statistics part that gets Bennett into trouble. ItIlaine-9/30/2005
798No actually I did not see or hear the entire context of the Bennett quote. SpenIlaine-9/30/2005
797Good to know and easy to remember. Thanks!Constant Reader-9/30/2005
796That sounds easy enough. Thanks.Lane3-9/30/2005
795Oops a triplicateConstant Reader-9/30/2005
794It has little to do with Bennett but is instead all about scoring political poinConstant Reader-9/30/2005
793We interrupt this discussion to bring you a public service announcement........ Rambi-9/30/2005
792Duplicate -- see later postConstant Reader-9/30/2005
791Things don't have to make sense to rev up the outrage machine. Rationality Lane3-9/30/2005
790The amount of press this is getting seems all out of proportion to me. Bennett iRambi-9/30/2005
789<i>i think if that were true you would see a number of blacks in the prisoLane3-9/30/2005
788lol! whatever you say billie boy... :)MulhollandDrive-9/30/2005
787i think the point he makes is that certain socio-economic conditions: young, unMulhollandDrive-9/30/2005
786OK Drivey, I get the picture. :-/Bill-9/30/2005
785<i>i'm not so sure...</i> I'm not following your argument. Lane3-9/30/2005
784<i>agree, though, that Bennett's direct tie was unnecessary. He could MulhollandDrive-9/30/2005
783actually the 'end in y' correlation to poorly educated doesn't seem MulhollandDrive-9/30/2005
782<i>Will read the chapter. Sounds interesting!</i> it is indeed (soMulhollandDrive-9/30/2005
781Teddy Kennedy Hillary Clinton Nancy Pelosi hmm, is there a pattern here? -g-Bill-9/30/2005
780lol! and it didn't seem to effect jimmy .... :) (it is interesting to notMulhollandDrive-9/30/2005
779 I was unaware of the comment. I quickly found it through a Google search. ITimF-9/30/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):