SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Plaintree (TSE:LAN,NASDAQ:LANPF)
An SI Board Since January 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1606 13 0 LANPF
Emcee:  TechAlive Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
806 By what benchmark do customers compare features and performance without particiSteve Morytko-11/17/1997
805 Plaintree's products are generally tuned for real world performance. Most oZvi Yammer-11/17/1997
804 I had been concerned that Plaintree was not mentioned in the article. Turns outDarrin Vernier-11/17/1997
803 Probably the most striking thing about the reference is that there is no mentioSteve Morytko-11/17/1997
802 In simple English, what does this mean to Plaintree? Particularly to the 9000 Aubrey B. Calvin-11/16/1997
801 On the distance issue. from the 11/10 network world article...... The Gigabit Zvi Yammer-11/15/1997
800 If you track the competition you might want to look at this: data.comSteve Morytko-11/15/1997
799 jeff, I think that if that box isn't selling or the profit isn't in Geub So-11/14/1997
798 Was it something I said ? Where did everybody go? Now more than ever, Keep the Geub So-11/14/1997
797 I hate to say it but the stock is dead maybe because they aren't selling tGeub So-11/12/1997
796 Do you think LANPF would sell-out for $10?. Of course, any buyout is wishful thjeff conn-11/12/1997
795 I know we have discussed this here before but, the number of shares is 20M? AGeub So-11/12/1997
794 Darrin: I really appreciate you taking the time to respond. It's hard to Brooke-11/11/1997
793 A couple of points about FDDI. First, FDDI is still very expensive technology frankd-11/11/1997
792 The "problem" that we are running into now is no more serious thDarrin Vernier-11/11/1997
791 Ah yes, Tony Cifelli being bearish on LANPF. Now that is a buy signal if everZvi Yammer-11/10/1997
790 What are you talking about?????? Mauro.OrionX-11/10/1997
789 IF (GE == DISTANCE_LIMITED) { LANPF= big_trouble; /* Won't get their produTechAlive-11/9/1997
788 I'd like to refer everyone to an older article by George Gilder which talksDarrin Vernier-11/8/1997
787 TO ALL: Please check out the article in PC WEEK online and explain it's imBrooke-11/8/1997
786 what's going on with this stock? I didn't think we would go below 3 aftjeff conn-11/7/1997
785 Yes Geub, you are very correct still, I'm sure there's away to let out Zvi Yammer-11/6/1997
784 Cern has a page listing most of the vendors that provide (or claim to) GigabitEDarrin Vernier-11/6/1997
783 Gueb So, I understand and support Plaintree's reluctance as you stated, buOrionX-11/5/1997
782 lanpf is not being unjustly paranoid in their reluctance to provide info on salGeub So-11/5/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):