SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
SLJB - Sulja Brothers Building Supply, Inc.
An SI Board Since September 2006
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1681 30 0 SLJB
Emcee:  Done, gone. Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
806Typical rfufff. The truth successfully eludes him yet again.Star the Wonder Pup-11/29/2006
805It appears that poster doesn't like the facts? eomshortsinthesand-11/29/2006
804common practice.....eomshortsinthesand-11/29/2006
803Hi RRUFF, sorry off topic,read the last couple of posts on the kitchen regardinyassinzineb-11/28/2006
802I'm not so sure that's the case. It's imprecise and, as even you sugrrufff-11/28/2006
801Cameila wrote "in the account of the Payee (same bank as me)" which imJeffrey S. Mitchell-11/28/2006
800Thanks for posting that. I'm wondering the spin that will be put on that torrufff-11/28/2006
799Yes, I agree, you are confused. It says deposited into a trust account at the barrufff-11/28/2006
798Here's a little more on Cameila's case, scroll down. LAW SOCIETY OF UPPJim Bishop-11/28/2006
797Yep that's what I said earlier.Jim Bishop-11/28/2006
796<i>She may not even have seen the check in question. If it was deposited dJeffrey S. Mitchell-11/28/2006
795I don't think this is comparable to CSHD. If it were, the stock would be at rrufff-11/28/2006
794like I said its all a good plot - maybe a miniseries withtwo plots running like Buckey-11/28/2006
793I agree -it's like a soap opera. I can't figure it out. If it's a rrufff-11/28/2006
792Who was the drawer of the check? Do we have any information, other than really rrufff-11/28/2006
791I just been reading. These people are windsor residents and some are not sharehBuckey-11/28/2006
790Jeff, I suspect the relevant post(s) were deleted. She may not even have seen tscion-11/28/2006
789That may very well be the case and I'm specifically not here to defend the mrrufff-11/28/2006
788Incorrect: Message 23051522 Correction looks like this: Message 23035179Done, gone.-11/28/2006
787That Homeresources site. Very interesting read from people who are in teh area,Buckey-11/28/2006
786[SLJB]: 68,697 Common shares Short Interest as of November 15, 2006 settlement dscion-11/28/2006
785In re-reading Camilla's reply to you, she only focuses on how PV was able toJeffrey S. Mitchell-11/28/2006
784What are you a repeater? Machine gun? LOL. My statements and posts was accurrrufff-11/28/2006
783It is not opinion, it is 100% fact: Message 23051522 Your statement was 100% iDone, gone.-11/28/2006
782Searched for: INTERNATIONAL BUILDING PRODUCTS (MICHIGAN) INC. <i>There iscion-11/28/2006
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):