SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Iomega Thread without Iomega
An SI Board Since June 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10072 15 0 IOM
Emcee:  Jock Hutchinson Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
8072 *********************************************************** Q: What reason is HardMoney-3/8/1999
8071 Volume Update Look at the Volume so far today. Under 350,000 shares so far. TRocky Reid-3/8/1999
8070 >>If we're all saying it, the opposite must be true, right? I'm sCogito-3/8/1999
8069 Michael Coley and I were saying the same thing at lunch Friday. If we're alFuzzFace-3/8/1999
8068 >>When I see this kind of apathy and hopelessness and people singing the Cogito-3/8/1999
8067 A few articles: Iomega is king of removable media vh1459.infi.net Memory moLinda Pearson-3/7/1999
8066 Allen I hope they are considering it. Frank HardMoney-3/7/1999
8065 <<Truff, please, i have a lot of respect for you and don't spoil thatRon Dior-3/7/1999
8064 Alright Sandy. We will talk via e-mail. But just to clear my position again, mySenthil Sankarappan-3/7/1999
8063 <Ozzie Osborne, general manager of IBM's speech systems division. > FuzzFace-3/7/1999
8062 You are correct to ask this question now, as the time has never been better forFuzzFace-3/7/1999
8061 Senthil, i am only back to respond to you....you have a lot to learn....iom is s. bateh-3/7/1999
8060 Mel, thanks for the mention of the interview! I had been away for a couple of Gottfried-3/7/1999
8059 This post is directed to Dave C and Dave S. I know how frustrated both of you asheila rothstein-3/7/1999
8058 David S., no need to apologize to me. Please don't waste any more of your Gottfried-3/7/1999
8057 Ben, even without BrowseMaster it is easy enough to ignore a poster. I now ignoGottfried-3/7/1999
8056 David and all... I just got my March issue of Maximum PC and there is an intereMel Boreham-3/7/1999
8055 Ben, No doubt you are absolutely correct in using this new software. The problDavid Colvin-3/7/1999
8054 Dave, My bloodpressure and general 'kick the dog' factor has gone way Ben Antanaitis-3/7/1999
8053 David, I'm with you. When the "creature" starts posting I just dDavid Colvin-3/7/1999
8052 To all, I received a private message saying my bathhouse crap had gone too far David S.-3/7/1999
8051 Senthil, thanks for the comments -- I too am one of the "long term" Ron Overs-3/7/1999
8050 Sandy, you and me differ a lot here. you feel good with few adds in paper. you Senthil Sankarappan-3/7/1999
8049 Truff, please, i have a lot of respect for you and don't spoil that image bSenthil Sankarappan-3/7/1999
8048 That's what I think is so funny. Gee, it must really be a rush making a biKM-3/7/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News