SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
PETM - Petsmart
An SI Board Since May 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1508 12 0 PETM
Emcee:  organicgerry Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
808 I don't think it is too early to say that we are going to be up again todayCaptain James T. Kirk-11/17/1997
807 If I may butt-in, PETM has preannounced the last 2 quarters, about 7 - 8 days fPaul Dubsky-11/17/1997
806 I have not followed ths stock long, so I must ask: Are they that predicatble iCaptain James T. Kirk-11/17/1997
805 Certainly we all need to "temper" what we read on these (as well as aPaul Dubsky-11/17/1997
804 I don't believe anything I EVER hear about others says "things he'Kirce Stojanovski-11/16/1997
803 Coming in at $.02 would be fine by me. Mr Luke seems to think differently, re:Paul Dubsky-11/16/1997
802 If we make the numbers with the volume we get, I suspect we'll get back to Kirce Stojanovski-11/16/1997
801 Retailing appears very strong this year. I wait to see its affect on petm. IfCaptain James T. Kirk-11/16/1997
800 Paul, I think they will come in at .02. With a slight possiblilty of them comiKirce Stojanovski-11/15/1997
799 jeff is 5x50 on the quotec 50 x 500 shares?Agamemnon-11/15/1997
798 Well, it does not appear that PETM will pre-announce. Now, we all need to gathPaul Dubsky-11/14/1997
797 <i>Petm is up, again, and that is what matters.</i> Couldn't aTom Klempay-11/14/1997
796 true, i have seen that also, depending on the rate of deterioration of the highCaptain James T. Kirk-11/14/1997
795 5 x 50 does not mean that it will drop. It means that there is more resistanceJeff Clegg-11/14/1997
794 Casecom RT qoutes. Well, when I see 10x10 it is null to me anyway, its when I Captain James T. Kirk-11/14/1997
793 What system are you using to see real sizes for Nasdaq stocks???? I can guarantJeff Clegg-11/14/1997
792 Minus a War, It really appears that 8 is days away. Could the earnings be not Captain James T. Kirk-11/14/1997
791 I must disagree, The sizes are an excellent indicator of whether or not the priCaptain James T. Kirk-11/14/1997
790 The Bid and Ask sizes are accurate for NYSE stocks. They are not accurate for Jeff Clegg-11/14/1997
789 Compared to yesterdays alomst 5 million shares traded we are up on almost low vKirce Stojanovski-11/14/1997
788 It likes 7, and selling pressure has died.Captain James T. Kirk-11/14/1997
787 PETM is off to a good start, up an 1/8 to 6 15/16 x 7. -tkTom Klempay-11/14/1997
786 15/16 x 7 explain why 10 x 10 is not accurate.Captain James T. Kirk-11/14/1997
785 For Nasdaq stocks, the block sizes (10 x 10) are not accurate (eom)Jeff Clegg-11/14/1997
784 Pre-open 13/16 x 7/8 sizes 10 x 10, looks promising.Captain James T. Kirk-11/14/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News