SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
COMS/USRX
An SI Board Since February 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1384 5 0 COMS
Emcee:  Jeffery E. Forrest Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
809 All: Communications Week article: 3Com Arms For Network Battle By John T. MulWigglesworth-3/11/1997
808 Well, no one can accuse MF of hyping one of their stocks :)Michael Anthony-3/11/1997
807 Jeff, I read the Motley Fool article and that was real bad. Profit Margins falthomas hayden-3/11/1997
806 Don't despair, the open option interest for the Mar 35 call was positive @ RAY WACLAWSKY-3/11/1997
805 RE: The Motley Fool Now that was negative. Sucked! No wonder they call themselPrice Monger-3/11/1997
804 More COMS/USRX merger coverage by the Motley Fool: fool.com This is labeled &Dick Smith-3/11/1997
803 >>So, is the only thing that is keeping USRX and COMS from merging is theDavid Lawrence-3/11/1997
802 Eric, hahahahaha... you're funny. Well CSCO is very tempting and i am willisimon says-3/11/1997
801 Eugene: thanks for the info. I think Wall Street will be focusing on 3COM on Masimon says-3/11/1997
800 Art: I did make a decent profit on LSI, but i bought some other stocks in with simon says-3/11/1997
799 USRX - FIRST CALL EARNINGS ESTIMATES USRX U.S. RobotiXpiderman-3/11/1997
798 COMS - FIRST CALL EARNINGS ESTIMATES COMS 3Com Corp. Xpiderman-3/11/1997
797 Oooohh I see!Scrapps-3/11/1997
796 Hi Scrapps, Not spamming, and not the fourth thread. . . just placed in key arJohn A. Snell-3/11/1997
795 John A. Snell this is the forth thread you have posted that on...you are SPAMMIScrapps-3/11/1997
794 And then there were none. . . This from "The Prudent Speculator", cuJohn A. Snell-3/11/1997
793 I just went back and reviewed all the numbers from Feb 10,the day the earnings 16yearcycle-3/11/1997
792 your original question regarding earnings went unanswered, everyone here knows 16yearcycle-3/11/1997
791 Glenn, <We need to get you thinking in a more positive direction<G> TLinda Pearson-3/11/1997
790 Stau, Ugh, a Canadian mining company? My idea of his giving me the money madeEric Prigge-3/11/1997
789 Alan, One curve ball you might want to consider for your analysis of NIC profiHassell Anderson-3/11/1997
788 We'll find out if the bottom has been reached this morning. H&Q just isDavid Lawrence-3/11/1997
787 You're right, Alan. But I DID actually recognize that earnings are more decsunny-3/11/1997
786 All COMS/USRX folks: Check out COMS dominant position in switching detailed indavid decamp-3/11/1997
785 Just read a report that in the last three days or so over 1B flowed into mutuadavid decamp-3/11/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News