SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Knight/Trimark Group, Inc.
An SI Board Since July 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10027 74 0 KCG
Emcee:  jacksoo Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
8102 Morgan, I will vote NO 75K.. hope it makes a difference.S. M. SAIFEE-5/5/2000
8101 Morgan, What about heavy debt burden??? KP loves to keep cash, I don't knoS. M. SAIFEE-5/5/2000
8100 The case for voting "NO" to the extra 300 million share approval. I Sir Francis Drake-5/5/2000
8099 A few months ago, I wrote a post on this board suggesting NITE acquire LAB. I tSir Francis Drake-5/5/2000
8098 gbh Did you notice an article in CBC market watch??. Talking about oldest and S. M. SAIFEE-5/5/2000
8097 Amusing post from RB. The poster cites a CNET link about tech stocks performancSir Francis Drake-5/5/2000
8096 No, it was not NITE <eom> MorganSir Francis Drake-5/4/2000
8095 <i>so for now until this is resolved I'll keep the name of the MM andgbh-5/4/2000
8094 No, it was Cyber. I only made 4 trades today w/ Datek, and those were all fine.Sir Francis Drake-5/4/2000
8093 <i>as I was getting extremely bad executions today on one particular stocgbh-5/4/2000
8092 <i>The guy is a moron, but I seriously doubt he had anything to do w/ NITgbh-5/4/2000
8091 NITE grew in size to be where it is at due to it willingness to accept all ordeGS_Wall Street-5/4/2000
8090 Here's an interesting story on the kind of abuses that occur in the market.Sir Francis Drake-5/4/2000
8089 The guy is a moron, but I seriously doubt he had anything to do w/ NITE's dSir Francis Drake-5/4/2000
8088 Does Howard Rosencrans actually get paid for this kind of garbage research? WheBWAC-5/4/2000
8087 Howard Rosencrans is wrong. Too bad CNBC had to quote him.Jerome Landesman-5/4/2000
8086 Any news on round table SEC conference today??? Thanks.S. M. SAIFEE-5/4/2000
8085 What do you think of this Jack A@@' opinion on NITE: cnbc.comfiberman-5/4/2000
8084 Here's what was weighing NITE down today and probably also explains the larAlohal-5/4/2000
8083 Yeah. But some OLBs still up, until now at least. MorganSir Francis Drake-5/4/2000
8082 Nope the trading overall in everything is not good. I am not seeing so much a bBWAC-5/4/2000
8081 You are not kidding about shorting above $35 this morning!!! thomsoninvest.netfiberman-5/4/2000
8080 I just can't figure out who is shorting. It was not retail, I can tell you Sir Francis Drake-5/4/2000
8079 Isn't this all getting just way too far past the point of being ridiculous?BWAC-5/4/2000
8078 This morning, NITE was massively shorted above 35. This is quite clear to me - Sir Francis Drake-5/4/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News