SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Bill Wexler's Dog Pound
An SI Board Since March 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10293 141 0 REFR
Emcee:  Bill Wexler Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
8118The REFR stock fraud... Kevin (or should I call you Bill ;) ), what is truly fuBill Wexler-7/17/2001
8117Nick/Nora: <I>All of A**man's argument is based on a clerical error iKevin Podsiadlik-7/17/2001
8116Kevin/Bill, Here is more research done by someone and posted on Raging Bull boaN. Dixon-7/17/2001
8115So how do you explain that SEC filing? Or is your solution to just pretend it dKevin Podsiadlik-7/17/2001
8114<b>Just in the interest of truth</b> So let's stick to the <N. Dixon-7/16/2001
8113Bill, did Asensio lie? THV was accused by Asensio of being involved with some wBinkY2K-7/16/2001
8112Nice find.... those one-trick card players always try to deceive the public. IRockyBalboa-7/16/2001
8111Just in the interest of truth... In a press release today Thermoview (THV), a cKevin Podsiadlik-7/16/2001
8110"It's still the same old story....the fight for love and glory...the fuDale Baker-7/16/2001
8109Bill Wexler - a man who (according to fraud stock promoters) can never seem to gBill Wexler-7/16/2001
8108InfoStream, of course I follow other stocks. I tried asking you guys about NTOPBinkY2K-7/15/2001
8107<i> However, for those of us that don't care about REFR, please feel fRockyBalboa-7/15/2001
8106Yes, I do indeed know when to pick a fight and this is not one I'm terribly Hank-7/15/2001
8105Hank, remind us why Wexler feels the need to repeat his posts? Your assertions BinkY2K-7/15/2001
8104Why do you consider Wexler's posts a threat? If his statements are based onHank-7/15/2001
8103Hank, I have no interest in posting here. Simply suggest to Wexler that his posBinkY2K-7/14/2001
8102Hank, post all you want. Why do you comment on REFR if you could care less?BinkY2K-7/14/2001
8101Refute him all you want but it would be nice if you guys confined your more vigoHank-7/14/2001
8100You call a few paragraphs long? Yes, you are also long winded and no I didn'Hank-7/14/2001
8099Hank, I caught you in a lie! Don't give us this BULL about brevity. You reBinkY2K-7/14/2001
8098Hank, recognized my additions? It was much shorter before I added a few paragraBinkY2K-7/14/2001
8097I'll wager $10,000 that neither of you ever formulate a legitimate wager witHank-7/13/2001
8096Ok. So I didn't read the whole thing. In fact, I read only the first senteHank-7/13/2001
8095<i>"You must have taken the day off work just to type it.</i>&qMama Bear-7/13/2001
8094Until you dispense with the notion that Bill and I are the same person, or you aKevin Podsiadlik-7/13/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News