The 2nd Amendment-- The Facts........ | Political Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics
The 2nd Amendment-- The Facts........

An SI Board Since June 1998

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
10167	74	0

Emcee: arno	Type: Moderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
8142	Usually you and I agree. I had to laugh at someone accusing you of supporting O	JeffA	1	5/24/2012
8141	My point is that it is very unlikely on facts as they stand... Times change ..n	d[-_-]b	2	5/23/2012
8140	My point is that it is very unlikely on facts as they stand.....not that it coul	jlallen	-	5/23/2012
8139	That is exactly correct JimS. There is no provision in the constitution, becaus	Farmboy	1	5/23/2012
8138	Y'all sent me to the Constitution. The Executive (Prez) negotiates treaties	Jim S	4	5/23/2012
8137	Seems we have finally fully agreed on something. :-) I don't beleive in er	d[-_-]b	2	5/23/2012
8136	I don't beleive in eroding US sovereignty by signing up to that sort of agre	jlallen	1	5/23/2012
8135	So to recap - You don't support the president You don't support the t	d[-_-]b	-	5/23/2012
8134	Nonsense. I don't fear it because I know from an intellectual standpoint i	jlallen	-	5/23/2012
8133	....nothing indicating that in anything I posted. Your support is defined by the	d[-_-]b	-	5/23/2012
8132	I don't support the treaty or Obama. Again....nothing indicating that in an	jlallen	1	5/23/2012
8131	The fact is the treaty was examined by past Presidents and found not in the Amer	d[-_-]b	1	5/23/2012
8130	Where did I "ignore" it? The FACTS are as the FACTS stand today your	jlallen	-	5/23/2012
8129	You are simply ignoring the trend in interpretation of the Constitution and law	d[-_-]b	1	5/23/2012
8128	Where did I indicate "blind trust"......in fact I acknowledged a circ	jlallen	-	5/23/2012
8127	unless the composition of the Court changes drastically any such move would be s	d[-_-]b	1	5/23/2012
8126	You have no proof that your position is more right than mine...its speculation o	jlallen	-	5/23/2012
8125	You're assumption that it'll never happen in this country is demonstrabl	d[-_-]b	-	5/23/2012
8124	You're assumption that it'll never happen in this country is demonstrabl	d[-_-]b	1	5/23/2012
8123	Except he didn't state anything relevant to the point. lol	jlallen	-	5/23/2012
8122	Don't ask me to explain Obama's thought processes...I don't agree wi	jlallen	-	5/23/2012
8121	There was no "defense" of Obama stated or implied.....I stated a simpl	jlallen	-	5/23/2012
8120	No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime,	Wayners	-	5/23/2012
8119	HOT LEAD VERSUS COLD BLOOD By Massad Ayoob for Backwoodshome.com magazine Hol	Farmboy	1	5/23/2012
8118	Exactly. Very well stated.	Farmboy	-	5/23/2012

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):