SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Bill Wexler's Dog Pound
An SI Board Since March 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10293 141 0 REFR
Emcee:  Bill Wexler Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
8143Yes, and I hear his secret lab is actually in his back yard and is made entirelyHank-7/21/2001
8142Another spectacular scientific fraud in the making... blacklightpower.com A meBill Wexler-7/21/2001
8141Recently it has been quiet.... There was little protest when I sold some in JunRockyBalboa-7/18/2001
8140I wonder if they'll blame it on me and threaten to sue again.Bill Wexler-7/18/2001
8139Speaking of battles once furiously fought: <B>Valence Technology AnnounceKevin Podsiadlik-7/18/2001
8138You just brought a tear to my eye! (sniff)Hank-7/18/2001
8137Ahhh...memories... Message 10645591Bill Wexler-7/18/2001
8136<i>Ironically, that was exactly the point Asensio was trying to make, thatN. Dixon-7/18/2001
8135<I>Since the SEC filings back up what THV stated</I> >sigh< AKevin Podsiadlik-7/18/2001
8134Since the SEC filings back up what THV stated then I go with them. As Bink stateN. Dixon-7/17/2001
8133Bill, <i>So, expenses and taxes aside, they might see $1.2 million this yN. Dixon-7/17/2001
8132Bill, what was not obvious? What Nancy wrote is almost correct. The translator BinkY2K-7/17/2001
8131Wexler, I saw NO damning indictments. Frankly, I see no reason to discuss THV. BinkY2K-7/17/2001
8130One could just take the word of XX, since XY will always contradict. If 2+2=5 doBill Ulrich-7/17/2001
8129why don't you guys stop arguing about refr and just get the Wall St Journal Ben Wa-7/17/2001
8128So let me see if I have this right. Company A says X as a point of fact concernKevin Podsiadlik-7/17/2001
8127Thanks for the 6% clarification. So, expenses and taxes aside, they might see $1Bill Ulrich-7/17/2001
8126<i>And those same SEC filings contain contradictory information in the &quN. Dixon-7/17/2001
8125<i>It isn't instantly apparent that REFR is getting anything out of thN. Dixon-7/17/2001
8124Interesting sequence of events: >>>SPD Inc. is shipping film and produBill Ulrich-7/17/2001
8123Tricky Nick, <I>The SEC filings back it up</I> And those same SEC Kevin Podsiadlik-7/17/2001
8122Bill/Kevin, <i>First of all, that was not all of Asensio's argument, N. Dixon-7/17/2001
8121On the one hand I see your point, but on the other I look at Xerox, Polaroid, SuDale Baker-7/17/2001
8120You might consider ALA (my old employer) as well. Supposedly they're strongKevin Podsiadlik-7/17/2001
8119The NT and LU "they can't both go out of business....can they?" arBill Wexler-7/17/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):