SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Iomega Thread without Iomega
An SI Board Since June 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10072 15 0 IOM
Emcee:  Jock Hutchinson Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
8147 Tom, the last 10 trades today went at bid. Isn't that a sign of selling preGottfried-3/10/1999
8146 Sonny, thanks for the news! "Iomega and Roland Team Up On Next Generation Gottfried-3/10/1999
8145 I'm told that CeBIT is on tap next week. Anybody have a decent rumor or spMichael M-3/10/1999
8144 RE: Who's selling? Sheila, It's a mix. The weak longs are chickening Tom Carroll-3/10/1999
8143 Here's the article on TokyoMex: SEC Probes Online Stock Picker TokyoMex BLinda Pearson-3/10/1999
8142 Darrell, do you think the drop in share price is the result of massive short ssheila rothstein-3/10/1999
8141 hrp...thought i would not post until next week, but here it goes...very heavy ms. bateh-3/10/1999
8140 <<It is possible that Iomega will preannounce in April. >> I was tD.J.Smyth-3/10/1999
8139 Darrell, I also agree that IOM may get to $3 again. And, that there will be a HRP-3/10/1999
8138 I agree with some of your remarks Thomas. It may get to $3 again, but would conD.J.Smyth-3/10/1999
8137 Darrell, This chart is in VERY serious trouble I know you are very intellThomas J. Smith-3/10/1999
8136 Larry,,,Dogging me will not help your situation with IOM... Read them and weep.Thomas J. Smith-3/10/1999
8135 Darrell - Nothing long term? That remains to be seen. Let's keep an openCogito-3/10/1999
8134 I'm with you Allen. This is capitulation, if not outright disgust. But,D.J.Smyth-3/10/1999
8133 From thestreet.com - "SEC Probes Online Stock Picker TokyoMex By Gregg Wcraigl-3/10/1999
8132 <<I don't like what I'm seeing!!! Lots of volume and the price cgil schmidt-3/10/1999
8131 <<at least it was nice to have a 20 minute chat with Tyler Thatcher and gil schmidt-3/10/1999
8130 Jackson - As I've pointed out before, moves which happen on big volume areCogito-3/10/1999
8129 Basically, there is no news and the "Street" has no patience. As areKeith A Walker-3/10/1999
8128 To All, I don't like what I'm seeing!!! Lots of volume and the price jackson-3/10/1999
8127 Update: Nothing like a good instant rebate by ingram to blow out 1000's ands. bateh-3/10/1999
8126 NEWS: biz.yahoo.comSonny-3/10/1999
8125 Cameron, yea you are probably right, just was thinking that they might consideMel Boreham-3/10/1999
8124 Barney, interesting possibility! I mentioned the discussion over on the MotleMel Boreham-3/10/1999
8123 Gottfried, interesting rates of return. Hopefully we will be able to look at aMel Boreham-3/10/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News