SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Iomega Thread without Iomega
An SI Board Since June 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10072 15 0 IOM
Emcee:  Jock Hutchinson Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
8172 <<Indeed, I personally find it obfuscatory>> Yeah...and besides tgil schmidt-3/11/1999
8171 Can this volume be correct ? " 4,223,600 NO, it is not correct. As of 1gil schmidt-3/11/1999
8170 Atta boy....keep guessing cRock! Frank Drumond-3/11/1999
8169 RE: Who's selling? Tom (or Darrell?) I also noticed the increased activiJim Welsh-3/11/1999
8168 Well well........seems as though the shorts are covering or the selling has finHardMoney-3/11/1999
8167 Rockys , Re:>>> IOM is bound for under $5, and when this barrier is bHerb Fuller-3/11/1999
8166 <I>Batek has the right to ignore such requests and post whatever Batek waJohn Solder-3/11/1999
8165  >>Can this volume be correct ? " 4,223,600 "<< NoRocky Reid-3/11/1999
8164 Herb, No. At 9:43EST it's 289,000 shares total volume trader this AM Ben Antanaitis-3/11/1999
8163 Herb, No. The volume was 288,000 at 9:43. Largest trade was 82,600 at the openHRP-3/11/1999
8162 Can this volume be correct ? " 4,223,600 " Last Trade 9:36 AM - Herb Fuller-3/11/1999
8161 John, To the extent that s. batek posts facts about Iomega's sales, this iHRP-3/11/1999
8160 John... Ditto to everything you said concerning S. Bateh's meaningless saleBBG-3/11/1999
8159 "SWEET HIGH MARGIN SALES"" <<After your week off why notgil schmidt-3/11/1999
8158 Nothing personal s.bateh, but for the last year+ you have been posting "swJohn Solder-3/11/1999
8157 RE: Going at bid Gottfried, Well, yes, trades at bid indicate a sell-off, butTom Carroll-3/11/1999
8156 <dont know if any one has seen this site. Its 360 systems........they are igil schmidt-3/11/1999
8155 dont know if any one has seen this site. Its 360 systems........they are in thHardMoney-3/11/1999
8154 Not so fast, young man!!! <<PS. I like CPQ in the twenties....>> Naggrachi-3/11/1999
8153 Count me in for a 1000 shares @ $2 15/16, which will hit. Guranteed! (eom) Naggrachi-3/11/1999
8152 I believe even more is priced in. I believe a loss of 5-3 cents is already priHardMoney-3/11/1999
8151 >>The component shortage could be used as an excuse for lower revenue or Cogito-3/11/1999
8150 Hello Thread, I hear David S. got suspended. Why? Is anyone else interestFred J. Ledo-3/11/1999
8149 >>There is no institution even thinking about going near this Syquest simCogito-3/10/1999
8148 Linda, we all made a terrible mistake: instead of iOmega we should have bought Gottfried-3/10/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News