SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
QUANTUM
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
9124 27 0 QNTM
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
8174 Looks pretty good (+.75), I was traveling all day and I was sure that I was gonStephen O'Hara-10/1/1998
8173 M.A.D., sure looks like something's up. Please check these intraday chartsGottfried-9/30/1998
8172 QNTM showing some strength (for a change) in a down market. Could something be JungleCat-9/30/1998
8171 An officer of QNTM, Richard Clemmer, exercised options for over 58,000 shares wSam-9/30/1998
8170 As of todays close we broke 10pts on the SEG, QNTM spread. It seems we have dSamuraiSam-9/29/1998
8169 Hope the associated circuit board doesn't put the crunch on QNTM and other Scott Moore-9/28/1998
8168 Quantum Announces Ultra ATA/66 Interface Backed by World's Largest PC OEMs Joe Knoll-9/28/1998
8167 That's right! And knowing which stocks to pick at these bargain prices tomoney man-9/23/1998
8166 Great article on QNTM and many others. I agree, they will be back, looks like &Myron Z.-9/22/1998
8165 QNTM is mentioned in an article on BizFN.com with reference to investing in undian-9/22/1998
8164 1000 Oct 10 calls traded late in the day at 6 3/8. Strange trade. What's Mark Oliver-9/21/1998
8163 I keep hearing more and more on SEG. Looks like its the stock of choice in thiStephen O'Hara-9/19/1998
8162 only for a profit >: - >> and its got a ways to go.. SSSamuraiSam-9/17/1998
8161 Well, we can guess now who wants to get rid of their shares. <>sarcastic Scott Moore-9/17/1998
8160 BT ALEX BROWN STARTS COVERAGE ON QUANTUM <QNTM.O> WITH A BUY RATING :) SamuraiSam-9/17/1998
8159 No, probably the tail-end of the two handed squeeze on a spent tube of toothpasScott Moore-9/17/1998
8158 It's reassuring to know that even some negative analysis by the MM'smoney man-9/16/1998
8157 Can any clever person tell me when Quantum had to halt the repurchase of their Mark Oliver-9/16/1998
8156 Mark, Surely y2k has to have some effect, but what?" That is the Y2K, er, Sam-9/16/1998
8155 I attended the Quantum annual meeting yesterday and posted my notes and thoughtMark Oliver-9/16/1998
8154 Ugh, this stock has been lethargic. Take a look at SEG now over 23 1/2...and QNSamuraiSam-9/16/1998
8153 Last week's news, slightly different take on it: techweb.com Apparently QNSam-9/14/1998
8152 Scott, First, QNTM isn't a single source for the IMACs even now, from what Sam-9/14/1998
8151 Isn't there a fear factor that Apple may go Maxtor, IBM, or another rather Scott Moore-9/14/1998
8150 Thanks for the link to those charts.... the positive volume line shows it prettMyron Z.-9/11/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):