SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
CardioThoracic Systems (CTSI)
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
207 3 0 CTSI
Emcee:  Gary M. Reed Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
82 Just a rumor but, I heard yesterday that CTSI may be bought out. The source of Howard Hale-4/18/1997
81 Chris, Excellent points! However, re: competition, don't forget that CTSIGary M. Reed-4/17/1997
80 Eventually, but my guess is who has the better technology, training and supportChris Baker-4/16/1997
79 While I agree that physician preferences are important, I would assume that pridr. z-4/16/1997
78 There is certain plenty of competition. CTSI 10-K says these companies have deChris Baker-4/15/1997
77 While this is an interesting company, I think heartport has a technologically bdr. z-4/15/1997
76 Howard - CTSI is now at an important point of technical support in that it is nChris Baker-4/15/1997
75 I dont know the answer to this but a Dr. Josh Pleasure seemed to be quite knowlHoward Hale-4/14/1997
74 The definition of risk is 5 year survival, and this is not known yet (both haveRobert Salasidis-4/7/1997
73 That's an interesting point that I hadn't thought of. But isn't CTSE Rosen-4/7/1997
72 Stenting, endocoronary radiation are two ways that are used (the former much moRobert Salasidis-4/7/1997
71 Robert, I would have to dig for refs, but was referring to newer devices fromBob Jagow-4/7/1997
70 Yes it is, but if MIDCAB proves to be equal to conventional bypass, then it wilRobert Salasidis-4/7/1997
69 <<Unless of course CTSI single vessel bypass is proven to be superior to Bob Jagow-4/7/1997
68 Unless of course CTSI single vessel bypass is proven to be superior to angioplRobert Salasidis-4/7/1997
67 It is my understanding (from the Barron's article a while back) that CTSI&#E Rosen-4/7/1997
66 I assume it was a sell the news sort of day. They announced revenues beyond whaRobert Salasidis-4/3/1997
65 Does anyone know why CTSI has been hit hard today?Pierre Borczuk-4/3/1997
64 Howard, The options announcement is probably pretty standard; CTSI will be pubBob Jagow-3/26/1997
63 Bob, (or anyone) Just read a Reuters "alert" about Chicago Board OptiHoward Hale-3/26/1997
62 Howard, <<it got back up to 31+>> It hit 32 7/8 intraday, looks likBob Jagow-3/13/1997
61 Dr. Josh, Very pleased that you responded. from a sheer laymans point of view,Howard Hale-3/13/1997
60 CTSI listed in the "10 Stocks to Avoid" column of the (new) April 199Ted Levy-3/13/1997
59 Columbia used HPRT's system for valve replacements and "complicated&quJosh C. Pleasure, M.D.-3/13/1997
58 Bob, Well I'm out of HPRT for now. I put in a stop loss at 27 a week or soHoward Hale-3/13/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News