SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Puff Daddy's Mo' Money Mo' Problems
An SI Board Since December 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
896 31 0
Emcee:  SouthFloridaGuy Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
821 Puff, I am sitting in cash... a friend just called me to tell me to get in befSBerglowe-4/13/2000
820 LOL. You do remind me of some of my opponents, I'll say that!<g> Mmph-4/13/2000
819 Ok, so basically we are in agreement about everything. 1) My facts are old hSouthFloridaGuy-4/13/2000
818 To: $Mogul who wrote (780) From: Stock Operator SouthFloridaGuy-4/13/2000
817 LOL. Is this what they call capitulation?<g> People don't believe itmph-4/13/2000
816 So my final question is, if people know all my "facts" why don't SouthFloridaGuy-4/13/2000
815 I see the medium term down. I see opportunities like today as an great time toSouthFloridaGuy-4/13/2000
814 Stock Operator, I hear ya man ... <<I THOUGHT I LOST A LOT, BUT I SOON REIFLY_Trader-4/13/2000
813 Okay that's it. You know the lines........I'm so excited, and I just Cheeky Kid-4/13/2000
812 Here are the facts you supplied: <i>1) Fed pumped liquidity in 1999 priomph-4/13/2000
811 What are the "facts" of my theory. You say they have been known for SouthFloridaGuy-4/13/2000
810 I'll try it one more time, Puff. I was addressing the rationale you offeremph-4/13/2000
809 mph...i believe you're understanding what i am saying...simply look at whatSouthFloridaGuy-4/13/2000
808 The whole problem with your thesis is that the underlying assumption is incorreSouthFloridaGuy-4/13/2000
807 Oh my. You surely are hostile. My post was not a personal attack, but simply a mph-4/12/2000
806 Better watch it. That minnow has teeth!Cheeky Kid-4/12/2000
805 <<But, Puff, the time to mention that analysis was several months ago.>SouthFloridaGuy-4/12/2000
804 But, Puff, the time to mention that analysis was several months ago. Perhaps pmph-4/12/2000
803 ANY OF YOU KIDS STILL DOUBTING ME? NEW Y2K CLOSING LOW ON NASDAQ. NEVER DOUBTSouthFloridaGuy-4/12/2000
802 <<Does your and A@P's concession to throw in the towel on longs mean SouthFloridaGuy-4/12/2000
801 Sure, there's plenty of great values. But don't use relative valuationSouthFloridaGuy-4/12/2000
800 and I agree with you that some most of the index stocks are over valued. My conInvestor Clouseau-4/12/2000
799 Ok, agreed. But the sentiment cannot be good since prices are and have been faSouthFloridaGuy-4/12/2000
798 >>Charts reflect the supply and demand for stock.<< agree 100%; hoInvestor Clouseau-4/12/2000
797 No, my friend. Charts reflect the supply and demand for stock. Ultimately, beSouthFloridaGuy-4/12/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News