SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
NANO
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2272 39 0 NANO
Emcee:  Norrin Radd Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
822 the ratio of current assets to current liabilities. tomtom pope-8/11/1997
821 "At June 30, 1997, the Company had working capital of $25,313,000 comparedJoeseph Dame-8/11/1997
820 Dia, NANO is not a shadow stock any more. The CANSLIM players are here to do thWade-8/11/1997
819 Wade, a current ratio of 7.8 is incredibly strong. I believe average current dia oko-8/11/1997
818 Dear Wade and all: I view the abnormally large cash position with mixed emotioJDN-8/11/1997
817 JDN and Hiram: Intelligent off topic discussions regarding general environment Christopher Brainard-8/11/1997
816 Doug F. Thanks for the note. I looked up semi.org for the current BTB but tmilton-8/11/1997
815 Doug, NANO just filed 10Q on Aug. 7 for the Q2. It stated: "At June 3Wade-8/10/1997
814 milton, The BTB ratio usually is released by SEMI around the 15th of each montDouglas V. Fant-8/10/1997
813 Doug F. Have you located the latest book/bill ratio? If that is due soon, tmilton-8/10/1997
812 Dear Hiram: We are getting complaints for being OFF TOPIC. Although I think thJDN-8/10/1997
811 JDN,we hold similar stocks huh,NANO and BAY. Well the last secular change in ouHiram Walker-8/10/1997
810 Wade, let's hope NANO won't remain a secret for too long <G>. reCrossy-8/10/1997
809 Hi Crossy, I left town for vacation since Friday(8/8) morning....just got back.Wade-8/10/1997
808 Would it be too much to ask if everyone sticks to the NANO topic???Bill Driscoll-8/9/1997
807 Hiram: What you are overlooking are two major LIFETIME events. The fall of CoJDN-8/9/1997
806 Hiram, pls. don't call those momentum people "idiots". They are dCrossy-8/9/1997
805 Milton,AAPL is NOT fundamentally sound,nor is it that MSFT thought that it was.Hiram Walker-8/9/1997
804 Hiram Note that today's reports that next week's figures might hint milton-8/8/1997
803 Dia, all NANO needs is a little sustained volume, and a little coverage by an aHiram Walker-8/8/1997
802 milton, we are all NANO believers, and my preaching was intended to refocus ourdia oko-8/8/1997
801 Wade, that's what I think too. Look the shares were in a consolidation in tCrossy-8/8/1997
800 Wade,depending on how bad the dflationary situation gets,the people with the moHiram Walker-8/8/1997
799 EG, Will move the notes next posting. IMO I think that EGLS is "levitatinDouglas V. Fant-8/8/1997
798 milton, Agreed. NANO is a long-term hold unless fundamentals change radically.Douglas V. Fant-8/8/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):