SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Sepracor-Looks very promising
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10280 115 0 SEPR
Emcee:  rkrw Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
8230The 07 vols should be higher than the 06s though so still a bit of work to get bRobohogs-4/12/2005
8229Jon, The IV's are no longer yelling "buyout" - seems to me they aBiomaven-4/11/2005
8228Guys, I just perused the vol data again and have a few quick observations. ORobohogs-4/11/2005
8227More about the Lunesta commercials: The Luna Moth was very prominent in the commJorgen Jensen-4/11/2005
8226I don't disagree with you Eric, but from the marketed product side, most StrRobohogs-4/11/2005
8225<i>Lunesta is going to be much cheaper to market than Cialis - no need to Jorgen Jensen-4/11/2005
8224"Steve Smith of TheStreet.con" 1) I assume the .con is not a typo. FRocky9-4/11/2005
8223Lunesta is going to be much cheaper to market than Cialis - no need to go to theBiomaven-4/11/2005
8222>> It seems that until a new biotech can break out of the mold and prove tIcebrg-4/11/2005
8221GENZ and DNA and CHIR are also acting well. So it is only the next tier down acRobohogs-4/11/2005
8220If so, it took 'em some time to register that information. What's wondetom pope-4/11/2005
8219market obviously had been discounting an outright rejection of CR :-)rkrw-4/11/2005
8218And it doesn't help when the supposed paradigm to which certain biotechs oncquidditch-4/11/2005
8217I am very long SEPR but I cannot help but worry when all the good news in the woRobohogs-4/11/2005
8216I see what you and Peter are saying, thanks. As I said, I haven't been follquidditch-4/11/2005
8215No, actually the 2007 options had vols compress from 40-50s to 20s when the takeRobohogs-4/11/2005
8214Peter, "the more short-term good news...." I guess I'm inclined tquidditch-4/11/2005
8213The 85's of '07 might be interesting for some mad money burning a hole itom pope-4/11/2005
8212Yeah - the trend started a few weeks ago - I think I posted about it then. My LRobohogs-4/11/2005
8211I'm resting more comfortably now, but I did need an IV about 5 minutes ago.tom pope-4/11/2005
8210I'd say arbs trapped from earlier - paradoxically, the more short-term good Biomaven-4/11/2005
8209Well, buying opportunity, of course, except that I did my buying at 58.65 :-(tom pope-4/11/2005
8208Well guys, Someone has a heck of a lot of shares for sell and is not shy about Robohogs-4/11/2005
8207As an aside, Steve Smith of TheStreet.con recommends closing out option positionRobohogs-4/11/2005
8206Anyone else thinking that the sleep drug market sounding a lot like the allergy Rocky9-4/11/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):