SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
JMAR Technologies(JMAR)
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
9695 80 0 JMAR
Emcee:  James Bowser Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
8245 Henry, I just wanted to vent some of my frustration with JMAR's stock priceBilberry-7/29/1999
8244 never thought i'd see such desperation from a perpetual bull the likes of henry jakala-7/29/1999
8243 Bilberry; Companies should put out New releases only when important changes orRichard N Lambert-7/28/1999
8242 JMAR closed at $1.78 today!!!!!!! Truly a pitiful valuation. The price drop iBilberry-7/28/1999
8241 i sure hope JMAR's PXS progress projections aren't as worthless as the henry jakala-7/28/1999
8240 You are both right. JMAR has not mentioned what is going on with Brightlight eBilberry-7/28/1999
8239 I had promised myself last year to sell JMAR if they did not come through with MRothaus1-7/28/1999
8238 I understand all of this. My comment to Bilberry was a reaction to a view thatFalstaff-7/28/1999
8237 Realtime wrote: <i>My main concern with JMAR has been that they apparentBilberry-7/26/1999
8236 But I think it is also clear that until this year JMAR has been focused on onlyreal_time99-7/26/1999
8235 No. Please recall how many times you pointed out that the fed funded R&D fFalstaff-7/26/1999
8234 Yes, there should be revenues to consider them as products. I think that JMAR Bilberry-7/26/1999
8233 Bilberry; Would you also consider a product something that produces revenue? Richard N Lambert-7/24/1999
8232 The x-ray sources use Brightlight modules. Would you consider that a BrightligBilberry-7/23/1999
8231 Who has read more into the annual reports? Would you including the press releaCASHSWISS-7/23/1999
8230 Robert; I don't see much in the chart. What good news I see is in the annMJCok-7/21/1999
8229 Maybe, maybe not. I have done exceedingly well on two other stocks buying into Robert Jones-7/21/1999
8228 Ditto from me - chart doesn't look great: techstocks.comStarlight-7/21/1999
8227 Light volume, looks kinda dead from here, IMO. Dave Swanson-7/21/1999
8226 Am I a victim of wishful thinking, or is this little darling starting to show uRobert Jones-7/21/1999
8225 What price will never be seen again? I'm 99% confident we won't see $1MRothaus1-7/20/1999
8224 Yet another great opportunity to buy under $2. This has GOT to be the last timMesaba-7/20/1999
8223 It looks like those inside buys were more mandated rather than done willingly. Dave Lippert-7/20/1999
8222 To All: This was the best Annual Report I have read from JMAR. I believe theyMJCok-7/19/1999
8221 We've heard that sooooo many times it's silly, but thanks for humoring Mesaba-7/19/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):