SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
NORTHGATE EXPL (NGX.TO)
An SI Board Since April 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
158 8 0 NGX.TO
Emcee:  grusum Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
83liz: does this mean you've lost your previous reticence about "Westernpeter snowdon-7/10/2002
82Thanks for your continued input... I've been buying as well... do they have LLCF-7/10/2002
81I agree with all your picks.Elizabeth Andrews-7/8/2002
80Re: Hedging I own and like ngx for the combination of proven reserves/ productispeculux-7/8/2002
79Liz, RE:junior companies. I know ngx is in this camp and I own it, I assume cbd,loantech-7/7/2002
78I read it as well and believe that the situation for junior companies with ounceElizabeth Andrews-7/7/2002
77I'd better qualify my remarks in the last posting. The valuation model doetyc:>-7/6/2002
76FWIW; I have just been reading Mining Web's interview with Pierre Lassonde,tyc:>-7/6/2002
75Liz, At one time you sugested not getting too diversified. Of course I get a litloantech-7/1/2002
74MAE is challenged by its location. It needs 3 million tonnes of +10/t g open pitElizabeth Andrews-7/1/2002
73If value doesn't determine market prices, what does ? Surely the market prityc:>-6/30/2002
72Liz, Speaking of value I hold NGX, but also hold MAE. What are their chances witloantech-6/30/2002
71Yes ! It just seems to prove that you cannot equate value in a stock with its mtyc:>-6/30/2002
70I bought some more NGX on Friday. This is the most undervalued gold stock on theElizabeth Andrews-6/29/2002
69Yes ! Another aspect of NGX's hedging that is worthy of consideration is ittyc:>-6/26/2002
68edited for more thought !tyc:>-6/26/2002
67Postscipt; So instead of putting up cash as margin, NGX has agreed to pay Brasctyc:>-6/23/2002
66>>The only lettuce Sprott has to eat his words with are 50's 100'styc:>-6/23/2002
65>>Let's simplify it. They borrow gold. They sell it to finance. They rtyc:>-6/23/2002
64>>So Northgate gets none of its money, but is is invested by someone else tyc:>-6/23/2002
63So Northgate gets none of its money, but is is invested by someone else just in E. Charters-6/23/2002
62>>Are you saying that Northgate got its money completely unsecured Pleasetyc:>-6/23/2002
61You seem to be so concerned with remote possibilities of disaster. Hell ! Whattyc:>-6/23/2002
60Postscript >>failure to complete the deal on the terms arranged will occutyc:>-6/23/2002
591. Assuring debt repayment 2. Financing There is a huge difference. Of course.E. Charters-6/23/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):