SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Applied Micro Circuits Corp (AMCC)
An SI Board Since November 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1805 111 0 AMCC
Emcee:  Dave Grady Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
830<i>and told everybody the equivalent that business was ballistic </I>Jack Hartmann-10/26/2000
829OT Steve, I sold RFMD at $14 after getting in a year ago or so at $17. That hJay Fischer-10/26/2000
828Thanks Doc. That seems to distill what we've been saying. It's why tSJS-10/26/2000
827Similar perspective from theStreet.com... Remember Komag? Think JDSU By James drsvelte-10/26/2000
826Agreed. Great paradigm. Add TQNT and KOPN to your list. Yup...that's why SJS-10/26/2000
825Q: How much does this spending reduction, as described, involve optical componenKayaker-10/26/2000
824<i>Can JDSU be increasing their forecasts, capacity and builds in the faceA.L. Reagan-10/26/2000
823We're going to hear alot about this very soon, Yak. I wanna hear from CSCO,SJS-10/26/2000
822Steve, I was looking for the supply/demand/inventory information in the JDSU CC.Kayaker-10/26/2000
821I know.....open up new markets! How about Antartica Telephone, and don't foSJS-10/26/2000
820<i>There are only some many companies than can be buying, integrating, andA.L. Reagan-10/26/2000
819Raymond: See ya later... the oversold optic stocks will all go up tomorrow, so ySans Souci-10/26/2000
818Rick, Steve and thread, I'm largely in concurrence with the viewpoints of Raymond Duray-10/26/2000
817Rick, Your words don't fall on deaf ears with me. I was with you during thSJS-10/26/2000
816Steve...I fear to say this for I know all too well what happens to posters who bwaverider-10/26/2000
815How can anyone take these Ana(asses)lysts serious!! They have to be the biggestbvinnieb-10/26/2000
814All well and good, but I am not letting the pain of the last few days escape thaSJS-10/26/2000
813By what kind of logic can this be considered undervalued? Other than "maniasea_biscuit-10/26/2000
812AMCC up 10 in AH. Potty time! (pardon my NY accent).Kayaker-10/26/2000
811Steve, thanks. <i>I just heard on CNBC that Drew Peck lowered his ratingKayaker-10/26/2000
810YAK, I just heard on CNBC that Drew Peck lowered his rating of AMCC from StrongSJS-10/26/2000
809Kayaker, my thoughts exactly, now lets make it a fact at 4:05PM. Go AMCC and Blbvinnieb-10/26/2000
808the other issue about the rev numbers is they are trailing and don't include16yearcycle-10/26/2000
807PMCS in the green, AMCC still down 14. Rodney Dangerfield comes to mind. Mr. MarKayaker-10/26/2000
806Gee, thanks.16yearcycle-10/26/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News