SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
JMAR Technologies(JMAR)
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
9695 80 0 JMAR
Emcee:  James Bowser Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
8345 news or articles ? pray tell what news has martinez ever produced that the mahenry jakala-8/26/1999
8344 Henry, we are probably not going to stop at today's lows either. My guess Bilberry-8/25/1999
8343 if it's not written by some outside firm then i'm really not interestehenry jakala-8/25/1999
8342 Henry - Call and ask the co. if they have a "hard copy". There wasn&Starlight-8/25/1999
8341 To all; Plain and simple... The market value of JMAR is a fair assessment of Richard N Lambert-8/24/1999
8340 so it seems, as based on your post, that JMAR itself performed this "studhenry jakala-8/24/1999
8339 The smaller the device, the better. Remember JMAR creates devices for a micro-wBilberry-8/24/1999
8338 Am I to understand that you are negative on JMAR now? The 2,300 Gigabyte devicMRothaus1-8/24/1999
8337 Interesting article on the EE times site. 2,300 Gigabytes on a device the sizeBilberry-8/24/1999
8336 That was the result of a market study of comparable companies. Check my formerStarlight-8/24/1999
8335 concerning that 132-140M assessed valuation is that something martinez dreamedhenry jakala-8/24/1999
8334 Henry - As far as building shareholder value -- the parts of JMAR today add up Starlight-8/24/1999
8333 been away - late question re: annual meeting did martinez propose any kind ofhenry jakala-8/24/1999
8332 Institutional Ownership... ...not a lot of new shares but some new names. yahtimwa-8/23/1999
8331 Henry, being a contrarian requires you to ignore the static and what appears toBilberry-8/20/1999
8330 <b>"But if your time horizon is 2-3 years, then you may see a ten bhenry jakala-8/20/1999
8329 The new opportunities are the x-ray crystallography, tomography, biology, microBilberry-8/20/1999
8328 <i>... new opportunities for the x-ray, which I believe will eclipse the Tulvio Durand-8/20/1999
8327 Tulvio, for quite a while we have known that x-ray is not the leading replacemeBilberry-8/20/1999
8326 The longer it takes bringing products to market the greater the risk becomes thTulvio Durand-8/20/1999
8325 Tulvio, you are absolutely correct. JMAR has promised dates for being done witBilberry-8/20/1999
8324 <i>... Please answer with a dissenting opinion, or anyone else who may diTulvio Durand-8/19/1999
8323 new buy per form 4 Martinez, John S Chief ExecutiPaul Lee-8/19/1999
8322 Regarding future financing for JMAR -- they have a line of credit, remember, atStarlight-8/19/1999
8321 I agree regarding time frames, but you can't state a time frame to the streRichaaard-8/18/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):