SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Rockwell-Spins off Conexant (CNXT)
An SI Board Since January 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2013 83 0 CNXT
Emcee:  jas244 Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
838 Medroogies, I think your RR analogy is fair to a point, however the rate of chLou Weed-3/29/2000
837 I'd say that he's not far off. The Economist talks this week about MeDroogies-3/29/2000
836 Not at all......I've been in CNXT since day 1. My 401K has bloomed nicely Lou Weed-3/29/2000
835 I've heard rumors that the fed was adding to liquidity, but I've notMeDroogies-3/29/2000
834 <The truth about interest rates is that they are being hiked by Greenspan buRarebird-3/29/2000
833 <i>>Conexant is SERIOUSLY overvalued even at these reduced levels. TheBeltropolis Boy-3/29/2000
832 The truth about interest rates is that they are being hiked by Greenspan but loDavid W. Taylor-3/29/2000
831 David, your analysis would be correct, were the market not experiencing a phaMeDroogies-3/29/2000
830 Wow, touchy. Lost a bunch of $$$ on your favorite stock recently? I call 'David W. Taylor-3/29/2000
829 What rock did you just crawl out from under?? Helllllllo....take a look at theLou Weed-3/29/2000
828 Conexant is SERIOUSLY overvalued even at these reduced levels. The current P/EDavid W. Taylor-3/29/2000
827 Chris, I've addressed Tice several times before. He's a shorter. ItMeDroogies-3/28/2000
826 <i>>Tice remains skeptical and spotlights the growth in inventory heldBeltropolis Boy-3/28/2000
825 I bought in at 90...and I'm preparing to buy more. I think CNXT is a greMeDroogies-3/28/2000
824 Those who are trading in and out of stocks like CNXT, based solely on what theyThe Ox-3/28/2000
823 I don't think TICE is as big a threat as he's made out to be. Often,MeDroogies-3/27/2000
822 Here's another message from Greg's thread: Message 13286496 Cites a pJill-3/27/2000
821 What do you think of this message about cnxt posted on Greg's thread? PlusJill-3/26/2000
820 The great <b> G</b><i> spake: </i> "The critical Ibexx-3/26/2000
819 (From QCOM thread): <b>CDMA drives power-amp fray </b> Mar. 24, 20straight life-3/26/2000
818 FYI, about Tice...the guy's a loser... Dear Andreas: Your conclusion seemsMeDroogies-3/25/2000
817 Exactly. These critical points on the chart can always signify one of two scenaDavid Rubin-3/23/2000
816 <i>CNXT is in dangerous territory now from a TA perspective</i> InWyätt Gwyön-3/23/2000
815 Conexant Systems (CNXT) 74 -7/8: AG Edwards upgrades to BUY from ACCUMULATE. PrSJS-3/23/2000
814 "I agree CNXT is not a household name as BRCM..." I am long CNXT andFR1-3/23/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News